Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30465646›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2018

TETyper: a bioinformatic pipeline for classifying variation and genetic contexts of transposable elements from short-read whole-genome sequencing data.

Anna E Sheppard, Nicole Stoesser, Ian German-Mesner, Kasi Vegesana, A Sarah Walker, Derrick W Crook, Amy J Mathers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genomic characterization ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Double carbapenemases inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  5. Global genomic epidemiology ofMicrobial genomics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. KPC-2 allelic variants inMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Plasmid genomic epidemiology ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. ThreeMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Genomic Characterization of KPC-31 and OXA-181Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna E Sheppard2​National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nicole Stoesser1​Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ian German-Mesner3​Health Information & Technology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Kasi Vegesana3​Health Information & Technology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
A Sarah Walker1​Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Derrick W Crook1​Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Amy J Mathers4​Division of Infectious Disease and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of the worldwide dissemination of antibiotic resistance has been driven by resistance gene associations with mobile genetic elements (MGEs), such as plasmids and transposons. Although increasing, our understanding of resistance spread remains relatively limited, as methods for tracking mobile resistance genes through multiple species, strains and plasmids are lacking. We have developed a bioinformatic pipeline for tracking variation within, and mobility of, specific transposable elements (TEs), such as transposons carrying antibiotic-resistance genes. TETyper takes short-read whole-genome sequencing data as input and identifies single-nucleotide mutations and deletions within the TE of interest, to enable tracking of specific sequence variants, as well as the surrounding genetic context(s), to enable identification of transposition events. A major advantage of TETyper over previous methods is that it does not require a genome reference. To investigate global dissemination of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and its associated transposon Tn4401, we applied TETyper to a collection of over 3000 publicly available Illumina datasets containing blaKPC. This revealed surprising diversity, with over 200 distinct flanking genetic contexts for Tn4401, indicating high levels of transposition. Integration of sample metadata revealed insights into associations between geographic locations, host species, Tn4401 sequence variants and flanking genetic contexts. To demonstrate the ability of TETyper to cope with high-copy-number TEs and to track specific short-term evolutionary changes, we also applied it to the insertion sequence IS26 within a defined K. pneumoniae outbreak. TETyper is implemented in python and is freely available at https://github.com/aesheppard/TETyper.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDNA Transposable ElementsWhole Genome SequencingFemaleHumansKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeMaleDNA Transposable Elementsantimicrobial resistance (AMR)Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)mobile genetic element (MGE)transposable element (TE)transposonwhole-genome sequencing (WGS)

Identifiers

PMID30465646
PMCPMC6412039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.