ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018
Uterus Allo-Transplantation in a Swine Model: Long-Term Graft Survival and Reproductive Function.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The pig as a medical model for gynecological diseases: an applied perspective.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- Uterus transplantation: from research, through human trials and into the future.Human reproduction update · 2023Review
- Involving Animal Models in Uterine Transplantation.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- The Key Role of Warm and Cold Ischemia in Uterus Transplantation: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Current Progress in Uterus Transplantation Research in Asia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study examined the feasibility and safety of allogeneic uterus transplantation (UTx) from a living donor and assessed long-term graft survival and the resumption of reproductive function in a swine model. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten female miniature swine with regular menstrual cycles were used; the animals were either donors or recipients (n=5) depending on the sibling. Retrieval surgery included uterus and uterine arteries together with the anterior branches of the internal iliacs from the living donor; the vaginal canal was cut. After the back-table had been prepared, bilateral internal iliac arteries were anastomosed end-to-side with the external iliac arteries. The transplanted uterus was evaluated based on the arterial blood flow by transabdominal ultrasonography and observed by secondary laparotomy after surgery; estrus recovery was stimulated by mating with a male, and artificial embryo transfer was performed in healing swine. RESULTS All 5 pigs revealed successful surgery without any surgical complications, injuries to other organs, or unanticipated vascular injury. All recipients survived for >3 months after the surgery, except pig 5, which died due to uterus necrosis 3 days post-surgery. A 100% surgical success rate and 80% long-term survival rate of the receptor were observed. Pig 2 had temporary estrus resumed, and the artificial embryo was transplanted 3 months after surgery; however, apparent gestation was not found by ultrasonography. CONCLUSIONS This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of the technology of allogeneic UTx, which was performed only by transplant uterine artery system from living-donor surgery in a swine model. Laboratory animals can show long-term survival and resumed estrous after UTx, which can be monitored by ultrasonography to assess the arterial blood flow of the grafted uterus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.