Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30465333›Full record

Observational studyJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2019

Time to Full Enteral Feeding for Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants Varies Markedly Among Hospitals Worldwide But May Not Be Associated With Incidence of Necrotizing Enterocolitis: The NEOMUNE-NeoNutriNet Cohort Study.

Marita de Waard, Yanqi Li, Yanna Zhu, Adejumoke I Ayede, Janet Berrington, Frank H Bloomfield, Olubunmi O Busari, Barbara E Cormack, Nicholas D Embleton, Johannes B van Goudoever and 19 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Early full enteral feeding for preterm or low birth weight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Relationship between feeding milestones and comorbidities with the postnatal growth in preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. [Expert consensus on enteral nutrition management for preterm infants in special situations (2024)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dilemmas in establishing preterm enteral feeding: where do we start and how fast do we go?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 16 institutions in 10 countries.

Marita de WaardDepartment of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yanqi LiComparative Pediatrics and Nutrition, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1437-9301
Yanna ZhuSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Adejumoke I AyedeDepartment of Pediatrics-Neonatology Unit, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Janet BerringtonDepartment of Neonatology, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Frank H BloomfieldLiggins Institute, University of Auckland and Newborn Service, National Women's Health, Auckland, New Zealand.
Olubunmi O BusariDepartment of Pediatrics-Neonatology Unit, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Barbara E CormackLiggins Institute, University of Auckland and Newborn Service, National Women's Health, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nicholas D EmbletonDepartment of Neonatology, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Johannes B van GoudoeverDepartment of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gorm GreisenDepartment of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Zhongqian HeDepartment of Neonatology, Shenzhen Nanshan People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yan HuangDepartment of Neonatology, Shenzhen Bao'an Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaodong LiDepartment of Neonatology, Shenzhen Nanshan People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Hung-Chih LinChina Medical University Children's Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Asia University Hospital, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Jiaping MeiDepartment of Neonatology, Shenzhen Maternity & Child Health Care Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Paula P MeierDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Neonatology, Rush University Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Chuan NieDepartment of Neonatology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Aloka L PatelDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Neonatology, Rush University Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Christian RitzDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per T SangildComparative Pediatrics and Nutrition, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas SkeathDepartment of Neonatology, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Karen SimmerCentre for Neonatal Research and Education, University of Western Australia and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Olukemi O TongoDepartment of Pediatrics-Neonatology Unit, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Signe S UhlenfeldtDepartment of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sufen YeDepartment of Neonatology, Shenzhen Maternity & Child Health Care Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xuqiang YeFoshan Woman and Children's Hospital, Foshan, China.
Chunyi ZhangDepartment of Neonatology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Ping ZhouDepartment of Neonatology, Shenzhen Bao'an Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Ibadan · NGEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLMaternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Bao'an · CNRigshospitalet · DKRush Children's Hospital · USShenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital · CNShenzhen Sixth People's Hospital · CNUniversity of Auckland · NZAsia University · TWFoshan Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital · CNGuangdong Province Women and Children Hospital · CNJinan University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

Health Benefits and Cost of Human Milk Feedings for Very Low Birthweight InfantsR01NR010009 · NINR · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MEIER, PAULA P · 2007 to 2011
$2.7M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransition to enteral feeding is difficult for very low-birth-weight (VLBW; ≤1500 g) infants, and optimal nutrition is important for clinical outcomes.

methodData on feeding practices and short-term clinical outcomes (growth, necrotizing enterocolitis [NEC], mortality) in VLBW infants were collected from 13 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in 5 continents (n = 2947). Specifically, 5 NICUs in Guangdong province in China (GD), mainly using formula feeding and slow feeding advancement (n = 1366), were compared with the remaining NICUs (non-GD, n = 1581, Oceania, Europe, United States, Taiwan, Africa) using mainly human milk with faster advancement rates.

resultsAcross NICUs, large differences were observed for time to reach full enteral feeding (TFF; 8-33 days), weight gain (5.0-14.6 g/kg/day), ∆z-scores (-0.54 to -1.64), incidence of NEC (1%-13%), and mortality (1%-18%). Adjusted for gestational age, GD units had longer TFF (26 vs 11 days), lower weight gain (8.7 vs 10.9 g/kg/day), and more days on antibiotics (17 vs 11 days; all P < .001) than non-GD units, but NEC incidence and mortality were similar.

conclusionFeeding practices for VLBW infants vary markedly around the world. Use of formula and long TFF in South China was associated with more use of antibiotics and slower weight gain, but apparently not with more NEC or higher mortality. Both infant- and hospital-related factors influence feeding practices for preterm infants. Multicenter, randomized controlled trials are required to identify the optimal feeding strategy during the first weeks of life.

Indexed as

AfricaAsiaCohort StudiesEnteral NutritionEnterocolitis, NecrotizingEuropeHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightIntensive Care Units, NeonatalInternationalityNorth AmericaOceaniaProspective StudiesantibioticsformulagrowthmilkNECparenteralpreterm infants

Identifiers

PMID30465333
PMCPMC6531355
OpenAlexW2901765782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.