Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30465318›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2019

Patient-reported outcomes in stroke clinical trials 2002-2016: a systematic review.

Eboni G Price-Haywood, Jewel Harden-Barrios, Christopher Carr, Laya Reddy, Lydia A Bazzano, Mieke L van Driel

Abstract readHistorical ArticleSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Registered Reports at "Quality of Life Research".Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Validation of the Spanish Version of Newcastle Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Measure (NEWSQOL).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eboni G Price-HaywoodCenter for Applied Health Services Research, Ochsner Health System, Academic Building - 2nd Floor, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA, 70121, USA. eboni.pricehaywood@ochsner.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2901-3852
Jewel Harden-BarriosCenter for Applied Health Services Research, Ochsner Health System, Academic Building - 2nd Floor, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA, 70121, USA.
Christopher CarrTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Laya ReddyOchsner Clinical School, University of Queensland, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Lydia A BazzanoTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Mieke L van DrielPrimary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGiven the global and economic burden of stroke as a major cause of long-term disability, patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data from clinical trials can elucidate differential benefits/harms of interventions from patients' perspectives and influence clinical decision making in stroke care management.

methodsThis systematic review examines stroke-related randomized controlled trials (RCT) published in 12 high-impact journals between 2002 and 2016 for (1) associations between trial characteristics and the reporting of PRO measures; and (2) psychometric properties of PRO instruments used in these studies. The study combines clinical trials identified in a prior review with trials identified with an updated literature search.

resultsOnly 34 of 159 stroke-related RCTs reported PRO measures. Among the 34 trials, most were published in rehabilitation and general medical journals, were conducted in the United States or Europe, were funded by government/non-industry sponsors, and focused on post-stroke care. Thirty-one PRO instruments were employed in these studies. Only 5 instruments were stroke-specific measures, whereas the remaining 26 instruments were generic measures. Eight instruments assessed functional status, 9 measured quality of life, and 14 assessed symptoms. The most common health domains measured were emotional status and physical function.

conclusionsThis study highlights the paucity of information from patients' perspective in stroke-related RCTs. This trend may change over time as researchers increase adherence to reporting guidelines for clinical trial protocols.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresHistory, 21st CenturyHumansQuality of LifeStrokePatient-reported outcome measuresRandomized controlled trialStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.