ArticleJournal of the history of biology2019
O Organism, Where Art Thou? Old and New Challenges for Organism-Centered Biology.
Article in Journal of the history of biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shifting Values and Shifting Risks: Debates on the New Biology in Germany and the United States Before and After Asilomar (1960-1980).Journal of the history of biology · 2025Article
- A new symbiotic, holistic and gradualist model proposal for the concept of "living organism".Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2025Article
- The Lady and the Plants: Two Notions of Teleology in Agnes Arber's Philosophy of Plants.Journal of the history of biology · 2024Article
- Scrutinizing microbiome determinism: why deterministic hypotheses about the microbiome are conceptually ungrounded.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2024Article
- Thomas S. Kuhn: key to a better understanding of the extended evolutionary synthesis.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2024Article
- Between the genotype and the phenotype lies the microbiome: symbiosis and the making of 'postgenomic' knowledge.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2023Article
- Analysis and/or Interpretation in Neurophysiology? A Transatlantic Discussion Between F. J. J. Buytendijk and K. S. Lashley, 1929-1932.Journal of the history of biology · 2022Article
- Between the Wars, Facing a Scientific Crisis: The Theoretical and Methodological Bottleneck of Interwar Biology : Introduction to Special Issue: New Styles of Thought and Practices: Biology in the Interwar Period.Journal of the history of biology · 2022Article
- Vitalism, Holism, and Metaphorical Dynamics of Hans Spemann's "Organizer" in the Interwar Period.Journal of the history of biology · 2022Article
- What's Wrong with Evolutionary Causation?Acta biotheoretica · 2021Review
- The Twentieth-Century Desire for Morphology.Journal of the history of biology · 2020Article
- Re-forming Morphology: Two Attempts to Rehabilitate the Problem of Form in the First Half of the Twentieth Century.Journal of the history of biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This paper addresses theoretical challenges, still relevant today, that arose in the first decades of the twentieth century related to the concept of the organism. During this period, new insights into the plasticity and robustness of organisms as well as their complex interactions fueled calls, especially in the UK and in the German-speaking world, for grounding biological theory on the concept of the organism. This new organism-centered biology (OCB) understood organisms as the most important explanatory and methodological unit in biological investigations. At least three theoretical strands can be distinguished in this movement: Organicism, dialectical materialism, and (German) holistic biology. This paper shows that a major challenge of OCB was to describe the individual organism as a causally autonomous and discrete unit with consistent boundaries and, at the same time, as inextricably interwoven with its environment. In other words, OCB had to conciliate individualistic with anti-individualistic perspectives. This challenge was addressed by developing a concept of life that included functionalist and metabolic elements, as well as biochemical and physical ones. It allowed for specifying organisms as life forms that actively delimit themselves from the environment. Finally, this paper shows that the recent return to the concept of the organism, especially in the so-called "Extended Evolutionary Synthesis," is challenged by similar anti-individualistic tendencies. However, in contrast to its early-twentieth-century forerunner, today's organism-centered approaches have not yet offered a solution to this problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30465299What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.