ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2019
Incidence of second primary cancers after radiotherapy combined with platinum and/or cetuximab in head and neck cancer patients.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of second primary cancer in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Pooled it
- Synchronous/Metachronous Prostate Cancer with Other Cancer Sites-The Experience of a Single Center in Romania.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Long-Term Survival in Metachronous Primary Malignancies: Stage III Nasopharyngeal Cancer and Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Role of HPV in Determining Treatment, Survival, and Prognosis of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2022Article
- Synchronous/Metachronous Multiple Primary Malignancies: Review of Associated Risk Factors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A Review of Controversial Issues in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Swiss Multidisciplinary and Multi-Institutional Patterns of Care Study-Part 3 (Medical Oncology).Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe second primary cancer (SPC) incidence after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy has not been previously reported. Our aim was to compare SPC risk following radiotherapy in combination with these agents for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
methodsThe charts of 296 cases treated for loco-regionally advanced HNSCC between 2009 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed for patient, tumor, and procedural characteristics. All patients were planned to undergo radiotherapy either with platinum compounds (group: Platinum) or monoclonal antibody cetuximab (group: Cetuximab). A third group of patients switched from platinum compounds to cetuximab due to toxicity (group: Switch). Treatment groups were evaluated for the incidence of SPC with log-rank test. Possible confounders were investigated with multivariate Cox's proportional hazards model. All tests were two-sided, and a p < 0.05 was set to indicate statistical significance.
resultsMedian follow-up was 36 months. Platinum, Cetuximab, and Switch groups consisted of 158, 101, and 37 patients, respectively. Three-year overall survival in the whole cohort was 70%. The rate of SPC was comparable between Platinum (9.2%) and Cetuximab (11.5%) groups (p = 0.98), whereas the patients in the Switch group were exposed to a significantly higher incidence of SPC (23.3%) in 3 years (p = 0.01). The multivariate model indicated Switch to be the only variable correlating with an increased risk for SPC.
conclusionsThe Switch strategy may expose the patients to an increased risk of developing SPC. The use of switch should be advocated with caution until robust pre-clinical and clinical data are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.