ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2019
Laparoscopy adjuvant total colorectal resection for the treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anastomotic leak risk factors following colon cancer resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2020 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo discuss and evaluate the safety and value of laparoscopy adjuvant total colorectal resection for the treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).
methodsFrom March 2010 to June 2015, 38 cases were retrospectively analyzed and divided into 2 groups, of which 17 cases used laparoscopy adjuvant total colorectal resection, and 21 cases used conventional laparotomy. Clinical data were obtained, and the safety and prognosis were observed.
resultsSeventeen cases using laparoscopy adjuvant total colorectal resection achieved success with no conversion to laparotomy and intraoperative complications. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups. There were significant differences in blood loss, the length of incision, postoperative recovery time of intestinal function and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (P < 0.05). The trauma in laparoscopy group was less, and could recover faster, and there was no significant difference in complications between the two groups. In addition, there were no recurrence, distant metastasis and death in the follow-up period from 6 to 56 months.
conclusionLaparoscopy adjuvant total colorectal resection is more safe and feasible, which has minimal invasion and can recover fast.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.