ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019
Cardiac T2 star mapping: standardized inline analysis of long and short axis at three identical 1.5 T MRI scanners.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020Review
- Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Article
- Androgen-deprivation therapy impairs left ventricle functions in prostate cancer patients.International urology and nephrology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T2 star mapping can be applied for in vivo cardiac iron quantification. Current recommendations of imaging acquisition, post-processing and interpretation of normal values are based on old scanner types and in house software packages. A standardized comparison of short (SAX) and long axis (LAX) segments using commercially available software packages and modern scanners is lacking. To provide a standardized comparison of T2 star time values in SAX and LAX and to investigate intersegmental, interregional and inter-level comparison and the interscanner reproducibility. 84 cardiac MRIs in 28 healthy volunteers were performed with three structurally identical 1.5 T MRI scanners. A commercially available software package for T2 star mapping with automatic in-line motion correction was used for analysis. Regions of interest were manually placed in each of the 16 myocardial segments according to the AHA model in three SAX and three LAX. A total of 2856 ROIs were drawn and 102 segments per volunteer were analysed. Interscanner reproducibility was high (91%) and the mean myocardial T2 star time value for all evaluated segments was 34 ± 5.7 ms. No significant difference was found between all measurements in SAX (35 ± 5.5 ms) and LAX (34 ± 5.8 ms). T2 star time values varied significantly between heart segments in the same axis and in 44% between corresponding SAX and LAX segments. T2 star time values in SAX and LAX have a high interscanner reproducibility but can vary significantly between heart segments in the same axis. Comparability between corresponding SAX and LAX segments is limited. To get representative results T2 star time values should be obtained in more than one heart segment and for follow-up studies identical segments should be used to avoid a systematic bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30465128What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.