Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30465128›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019

Cardiac T2 star mapping: standardized inline analysis of long and short axis at three identical 1.5 T MRI scanners.

Rafael Heiss, Marco Wiesmueller, Christoph Treutlein, Hannes Seuss, Michael Uder, Matthias May, Wolfgang Wuest

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cardiac TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020
    Review
  2. Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rafael HeissDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. rafael.heiss@uk-erlangen.de.
Marco WiesmuellerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Christoph TreutleinDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Hannes SeussDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Michael UderDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias MayDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Wolfgang WuestDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T2 star mapping can be applied for in vivo cardiac iron quantification. Current recommendations of imaging acquisition, post-processing and interpretation of normal values are based on old scanner types and in house software packages. A standardized comparison of short (SAX) and long axis (LAX) segments using commercially available software packages and modern scanners is lacking. To provide a standardized comparison of T2 star time values in SAX and LAX and to investigate intersegmental, interregional and inter-level comparison and the interscanner reproducibility. 84 cardiac MRIs in 28 healthy volunteers were performed with three structurally identical 1.5 T MRI scanners. A commercially available software package for T2 star mapping with automatic in-line motion correction was used for analysis. Regions of interest were manually placed in each of the 16 myocardial segments according to the AHA model in three SAX and three LAX. A total of 2856 ROIs were drawn and 102 segments per volunteer were analysed. Interscanner reproducibility was high (91%) and the mean myocardial T2 star time value for all evaluated segments was 34 ± 5.7 ms. No significant difference was found between all measurements in SAX (35 ± 5.5 ms) and LAX (34 ± 5.8 ms). T2 star time values varied significantly between heart segments in the same axis and in 44% between corresponding SAX and LAX segments. T2 star time values in SAX and LAX have a high interscanner reproducibility but can vary significantly between heart segments in the same axis. Comparability between corresponding SAX and LAX segments is limited. To get representative results T2 star time values should be obtained in more than one heart segment and for follow-up studies identical segments should be used to avoid a systematic bias.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesEquipment DesignFemaleHealthy VolunteersHeartHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedIronMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMyocardiumObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsIronCross-sectional studyHeartMagnetic resonance imagingReproducibility of results

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.