Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30465094›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports2019

Targeted deletion of rice retrotransposon Tos17 via CRISPR/Cas9.

Hiroaki Saika, Akiko Mori, Masaki Endo, Seiichi Toki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Genome Editing in Cereals: Approaches, Applications and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Inactivation of retrotransposonPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. CRISPR/Cas9-mediatedHorticulture research · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroaki SaikaPlant Genome Engineering Research Unit, Division of Applied Genetics, Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 1-2 Owashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8634, Japan. saika@affrc.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0716-2518
Akiko MoriPlant Genome Engineering Research Unit, Division of Applied Genetics, Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 1-2 Owashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8634, Japan.
Masaki EndoPlant Genome Engineering Research Unit, Division of Applied Genetics, Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 1-2 Owashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8634, Japan.
Seiichi TokiPlant Genome Engineering Research Unit, Division of Applied Genetics, Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 1-2 Owashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8634, Japan.
National Agriculture and Food Research Organization · JPKihara Institute for Biological Research · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageA successful example of transposon deletion via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing suggests a novel alternative approach to plant breeding. Transposition of transposable elements (TEs) can affect adjacent genes, leading to changes in genetic traits. Expression levels and patterns, splicing and epigenetic status, and function of genes located in, or near, the inserted/excised locus can be affected. Artificial modification of loci adjacent to TEs, or TEs themselves, by genome editing could mimic the translocation of TEs that occurs in nature, suggesting that it might be possible to produce novel plants by modification of TEs via genome editing. To our knowledge, there are no reports thus far of modification of TEs by genome editing in plants. In this study, we performed targeted deletion of the Tos17 retrotransposon, which is flanked at both ends by long terminal repeat (LTR) sequences, via genome editing in rice. We succeeded in targeted mutagenesis of the LTR, and targeted deletion between LTRs, in calli transformed with CRISPR/Cas9 vectors for the Tos17 LTR. Moreover, we also successfully obtained regenerated plants derived from transformed calli and plants homozygous for lacking Tos17 in the next generation. Taken together, our results demonstrate successful deletion of the Tos17 retrotransposon from the rice genome by targeted mutagenesis using CRISPR/Cas9. We believe that this strategy could be applied to other TEs in many plant species, providing a rapid breeding technology as an alternative means to re-activate expression of agronomically important genes that have been inactivated by TE insertion, especially in plants such as fruit trees, in which it is difficult to maintain parental agronomical traits by cross-breeding due to high heterozygosity.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA Transposable ElementsGene EditingGenome, PlantOryzaRetroelementsTerminal Repeat SequencesDNA Transposable ElementsRetroelementsCRISPR/Cas9Genome editingLong terminal repeatRiceTargeted deletionTransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID30465094
OpenAlexW2901151079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.