ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2019
Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy: single-center experience and technical aspects.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluation of 350 robotic liver resections performed by an early adopter in laparoscopic liver surgery: clinical outcomes and critical appraisal of the learning curve.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Combining occlusion of the right hepatic vein with the Pringle maneuver in laparoscopic anatomic right posterior liver resection.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Prevalence and clinical significance of the Sg6/Sg7 intersegmental veins based on re-evaluation of the Couinaud classification for the right posterior portal vein.Updates in surgery · 2023Article
- Challenging Scenarios and Debated Indications for Laparoscopic Liver Resections for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancers · 2023Review
- Transition from laparoscopic to robotic liver surgery: clinical outcomes, learning curve effect, and cost-effectiveness.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic right posterior hepatectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- One-stage laparoscopic parenchymal sparing liver resection for bilobar colorectal liver metastases: safety, recurrence patterns and oncologic outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- The role of the laparoscopic approach in two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a single-center experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs. open approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy.The British journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic versus open right posterior sectionectomy: an international, multicenter, propensity score-matched evaluation.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- A multicenter cohort analysis of laparoscopic hepatic caudate lobe resection.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLaparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) is a technically demanding procedure. The aim of this article is to share our experience with LRPS and to highlight technical aspects of this procedure.
methodsThis is a single-center retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent LRPS between September 2011 and October 2017. Data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Video-in-picture (VIP) technology is used to facilitate and to highlight the technical aspects of this procedure.
resultsIn total, 18 patients underwent LRPS. Indication for surgery was mainly liver metastases (n = 11) and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 6). The Glissonean approach for inflow control was used in 13 patients. Median operative time was 162 (140-190) minutes. Median blood loss was 325 mL (IQR: 150-450). One conversion (5.5%) was required. There were two minor complications and one major complication. Median hospital stay was 6 days (range 5-8 days). All patients had an R0 resection. There was no 90-day mortality.
conclusionThe results of our experience in LRPS add weight to the feasibility and safety of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30465088What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.