Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30464853›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters2018

Comparison of interactive and automatic segmentation of stereoelectroencephalography electrodes on computed tomography post-operative images: preliminary results.

Sahar Benadi, Irene Ollivier, Caroline Essert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Generation of synthetic training data for SEEG electrodes segmentation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sahar BenadiICube, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Strasbourg, France.
Irene OllivierDepartment of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Caroline EssertICube, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2572-9730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereoelectroencephalography is a surgical procedure used in the treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Multiple electrodes are inserted in the patient's brain in order to record the electrical activity and detect the epileptogenic zone at the source of the seizures. An accurate localisation of their contacts on post-operative images is a crucial step to interpret the recorded signals and achieve a successful resection afterwards. In this Letter, the authors propose interactive and automatic methods to help the surgeon with the segmentation of the electrodes and their contacts. Then, they present a preliminary comparison of the methods in terms of accuracy and processing time through experimental measurements performed by two users, and discuss these first results. The final purpose of this work is to assist the neurosurgeons and neurologists in the contacts localisation procedure, make it faster, more precise and less tedious.

Indexed as

accurate localisationautomatic segmentationbiomedical electrodescomputed tomography post-operative imagescomputerised tomographycontact localisation procedureelectrical activityelectroencephalographyepileptogenic zoneimage segmentationinteractive segmentationmedical disordersmedical image processingmultiple electrodesneurophysiologypatient brainpharmacoresistant epilepsy treatmentprocessing timerecorded signalsseizuresstereoelectroencephalography electrodessuccessful resectionsurgerysurgical procedure

Identifiers

PMID30464853
PMCPMC6222176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.