Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30464825›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2018

Taxonomy-based hierarchical analysis of natural mortality: polar and subpolar phocid seals.

Irina S Trukhanova, Paul B Conn, Peter L Boveng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irina S TrukhanovaPolar Science Center Applied Physics Laboratory University of Washington Seattle Washington.ORCID 0000-0001-9058-4481
Paul B ConnMarine Mammal Laboratory Alaska Fisheries Science Center NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Seattle Washington.
Peter L BovengMarine Mammal Laboratory Alaska Fisheries Science Center NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Seattle Washington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of life-history parameters is frequently lacking in many species and populations, often because they are cryptic or logistically challenging to study, but also because life-history parameters can be difficult to estimate with adequate precision. We suggest using hierarchical Bayesian analysis (HBA) to analyze variation in life-history parameters among related species, with prior variance components representing shared taxonomy, phenotypic plasticity, and observation error. We develop such a framework to analyze U-shaped natural mortality patterns typical of mammalian life history from a variety of sparse datasets. Using 39 datasets from seals in the family Phocidae, we analyzed 16 models with different formulations for natural morality, specifically the amount of taxonomic and data-level variance components (subfamily, species, study, and dataset levels) included in mortality hazard parameters. The highest-ranked model according to DIC included subfamily-, species-, and dataset-level parameter variance components and resulted in typical U-shaped hazard functions for the 11 seal species in the study. Species with little data had survival schedules shrunken to the mean. We suggest that evolutionary and population ecologists consider employing HBA to quantify variation in life-history parameters. This approach can be useful for increasing the precision of estimates resulting from a collection of (often sparse) datasets, and for producing prior distributions for populations missing life-history data.

Indexed as

Bayesian hierarchical modelsnatural mortalityphocid seals

Identifiers

PMID30464825
PMCPMC6238133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.