Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30464792›Full record

ArticleAmerican health & drug benefits2018

The Prevalence and Payer Costs of Potentially Avoidable Emergent Care Visits for Suspected Amniotic Membrane Rupture in Pregnant Women.

Christine Ferro, Bruce S Pyenson, Jocelyn Lau, Mona Kelkar, Nancy Phillips, Chi-Wei Lu, Percy Yeung, Gloria Bachmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American health & drug benefits, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine FerroHealthcare Analytics Consultant, Milliman, New York, NY.
Bruce S PyensonPrincipal & Consulting Actuary, Milliman.
Jocelyn LauHealthcare Analytics Manager, Milliman.
Mona KelkarHealthcare Analytics Manager, Milliman.
Nancy PhillipsAssociate Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Chi-Wei LuDirector of Research, Women's Health Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.
Percy YeungClinical Research Specialist, Women's Health Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.
Gloria BachmannProfessor and Vice Chair, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, and Director of Women's Health Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.
Johnson University · USMilliman (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcern over amniotic fluid leakage is common among pregnant women. Uncertainty about prelabor rupture of amniotic membranes (PROM) can lead women to present to emergency departments or to labor and delivery units for medical evaluation. Many of such visits do not result in delivery, yet they carry significant, and potentially unnecessary, healthcare expenditures.

objectiveTo estimate the prevalence and payer cost of potentially avoidable visits by pregnant women to an emergent care facility (including emergency departments, labor and delivery units, or observation units) for suspected PROM.

methodsThis study included 2 processes-an electronic medical records chart review and a commercial health insurance claims data analysis. The medical chart review included 843 scheduled and 1250 unscheduled pregnancy-related visits at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital between January 4 and June 30, 2017, which was conducted to determine the rates of visits by pregnant women with suspected PROM and their results (ie, hospital admission or discharge). In addition, we performed a retrospective analysis of medical claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Database to measure population-level incidence rates and the costs of pregnancy-related emergent care visits for suspected PROM.

resultsOf the 1250 unscheduled visits reviewed, 663 did not result in delivery; of these, 68 had a primary complaint of suspected PROM, and 55 (81%) of them were discharged with PROM ruled out. Of all scheduled and unscheduled nondelivery visits (N = 1069), 5.1% (N = 55) were associated with suspected PROM but were discharged home with PROM ruled out. In the commercial claims analysis, the average rate of emergent care visits by pregnant women was 436.69 per 1000 deliveries, with an estimated average cost of $1428 per visit (in 2018 dollars), or $0.58 per member per month. Applying the rates from our chart review to the claims data, we estimated that commercial insurers pay, on average, for approximately 22.47 facility visits per 1000 deliveries for suspected and ruled-out PROM.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that for most PROM cases that do not result in delivery, PROM is ruled out and patients are sent home. Reducing the number of PROM-related visits to emergent care facilities that result in ruled-out PROM could reduce healthcare costs and help patients and providers avoid these inconvenient visits.

Indexed as

amniotic fluid leakageavoidable costsemergent care visitslabor and deliverypayer costsprelabor rupture of amniotic membranesself-monitoring suspected PROM

Identifiers

PMID30464792
PMCPMC6207302
OpenAlexW2953113390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.