Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30464695›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2018

Geographic variation in surgical practice patterns and outcomes for resected nonmetastatic gastric cancer in Ontario.

A L Mahar, A El-Sedfy, M Dixon, M Siddiqui, M Elmi, A Ritter, J Vasilevska-Ristovska, Y Jeong, L Helyer, C Law and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gastrectomy case volume and textbook outcome: an analysis of the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours of Ontario (PRESTO).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

A L MaharDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
A El-SedfyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
M DixonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
M SiddiquiDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
M ElmiDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
A RitterDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
J Vasilevska-RistovskaHospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON.
Y JeongDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
L HelyerDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
C LawDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
B ZagorskiInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
N G CoburnDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gastrectomy with negative resection margins and adequate lymph node dissection is the cornerstone of curative treatment for gastric cancer (gc). However, gastrectomy is a complex and invasive operation with significant morbidity and mortality. Little is known about surgical practice patterns or short- and long-term outcomes in early-stage gc in Canada. Methods: We undertook a population-based retrospective cohort study of patients with gc diagnosed between 1 April 2005 and 31 March 2008. Chart review provided clinical and operative details such as disease stage, primary tumour location, surgical approach, operation, lymph nodes, and resection margins. Administrative data provided patient demographics, geography, and vital status. Variations in treatment and outcomes were compared for 14 local health integration networks. Descriptive statistics and log-rank tests were used to examine geographic variation. Results: We identified 722 patients with nonmetastatic resected gc. We documented significant provincial variation in case mix, including primary tumour location, stage at diagnosis, and tumour grade. Short-term surgical outcomes varied across the province. The percentage of patients with 15 or fewer lymph nodes removed and examined varied from 41.8% to 73.8% ( Conclusions: This cohort of patients with resected stages i-iii gc is the largest analyzed in Canada, providing important historical information about treatment outcomes. Understanding the causes of regional variation will support interventions aiming to improve gc operative outcomes in the cancer system.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleGastrectomyGeographyHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeprognosisSurgeryvariations

Identifiers

PMID30464695
PMCPMC6209544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.