Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30464694›Full record

Observational studyCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2018

Changes in preoperative endoscopic and percutaneous bile drainage in patients with periampullary cancer undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in Ontario: effect on clinical practice of a randomized trial.

D J Kagedan, J D Mosko, M E Dixon, P J Karanicolas, A C Wei, N Goyert, Q Li, N Mittmann, N G Coburn

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

D J KagedanDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
J D MoskoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
M E DixonDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
P J KaranicolasDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
A C WeiDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
N GoyertSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON.
Q LiInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON.
N MittmannHealth Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research Centre, Toronto, ON.
N G CoburnDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
University of Toronto · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In 2010, a multicentre randomized controlled trial reported increased postoperative complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy (pde) patients undergoing preoperative biliary decompression (pbd). We evaluated the effect of that publication on rates of pbd at the population level. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study identified patients undergoing pde for malignancy, 2005-2013, linking them with administrative health care databases covering medical services for a population of 13.5 million. Patients undergoing pbd within 6 weeks before their surgery were identified using physician billing codes and were divided into those undergoing pde before and after article publication, with a 6-month washout period. Chi-square tests were used to compare rates of pbd. Results: Of 1997 pde patients identified, 963 underwent surgery before article publication, and 911, after (123 during the washout period). The rate of pbd was 47.5% before publication, and 41.6% after ( Conclusions: Rates of pbd have declined a small, but significant, amount after randomized trial publication. Persistence of pbd might relate to suboptimal knowledge translation, the role of pbd in diagnosis of periampullary malignancy, and treatment of complications (cholangitis, severe hyperbilirubinemia) or anticipation of delay from diagnosis to surgery. The nadir in pbd rates after article publication and the subsequent rise suggest an element of transience in the effect of article publication on clinical practice. Further investigation into the reasons for persistent pbd is needed.

Indexed as

BileDrainagePancreaticoduodenectomyAgedAged, 80 and overAmpulla of VaterCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsEndoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPreoperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicoutcomesPancreatic neoplasiaperiampullary tumoursresection

Identifiers

PMID30464694
PMCPMC6209556
OpenAlexW2899486913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.