Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30464677›Full record

ReviewPediatric health, medicine and therapeutics2018

Perforation risk in pediatric appendicitis: assessment and management.

Erin C Howell, Emily D Dubina, Steven L Lee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05511194 (Safety and Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Therapeutic Protocol for Complicated Appendicitis in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05511194 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Therapeutic Protocol for Complicated Appendicitis in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialRan2022 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsEnhanced Recovery After Surgery, Appendicitis, Children, OnlyArmsEnhanced Recovery After Surgery therapeutic protocol, Conventional management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Incidentally-detected nonspecific and unusual histopathological findings in childhood appendectomy specimens: a retrospective analysis of 2633 cases.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin C HowellDepartment of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA, stevenlee@mednet.ucla.edu.
Emily D DubinaDepartment of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA, stevenlee@mednet.ucla.edu.
Steven L LeeDepartment of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA, stevenlee@mednet.ucla.edu.
Harbor–UCLA Medical Center · USUCLA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perforated appendicitis, as defined by a visible hole in the appendix or an appendicolith free within the abdomen, carries significant morbidity in the pediatric population. Accurate diagnosis is challenging as there is no single symptom or sign that accurately predicts perforated appendicitis. Younger patients and those with increased duration of symptoms are at higher risk of perforated appendicitis. Elevated leukocytosis, bandemia, high C-reactive protein, hyponatremia, ultrasound, and CT are all useful tools in diagnosis. Distinguishing patients with perforation from those without is important given the influence of a perforation diagnosis on the management of the patient. Treatment for perforated appendicitis remains controversial as several options exist, each with its indications and merits, illustrating the complexity of this disease process. Patients may be managed non-operatively with antibiotics, with or without interval appendectomy. Patients may also undergo appendectomy early in the course of their index hospitalization. Factors known to predict failure of non-operative management include appendicolith, leukocytosis greater than 15,000 white blood cells per microliter, increased bands, and CT evidence of disease beyond the right lower quadrant. In this review, the indications and benefits of each treatment strategy will be discussed and an algorithm to guide treatment decisions will be proposed.

Indexed as

diagnosisinterval appendectomymanagementpediatricperforated appendicitis

Identifiers

PMID30464677
PMCPMC6209076
OpenAlexW2898420293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.