Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30464492›Full record

ReviewTherapeutics and clinical risk management2018

Targeted treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: spotlight on rucaparib.

Diana C Pearre, Krishnansu S Tewari

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Role of PARP Inhibitors: A New Hope for Breast Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances and perspectives of PARP inhibitors.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana C PearreDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA, ktewari@uci.edu.
Krishnansu S TewariDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA, ktewari@uci.edu.
Gynecologic Oncology Group · US

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
INSTITUTIONAL NATIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE AWARDT32CA060396 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BRISTOW, ROBERT EDWARD · 1994 to 2020
$4.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414NCI NIH HHS T32 CA060396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last 2 years have ushered in a new era in ovarian cancer therapy with the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) approval of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi). One of the deadliest cancers that women experience, ovarian cancer, is most often diagnosed in advanced stages. Although cytoreductive surgery and (platinum/taxane-based) chemotherapy can place the majority of patients into remission, most will experience a relapse of their disease in their lifetime. This has led to studies exploring the benefits and efficacy of maintenance treatment. This review will briefly discuss the history of maintenance therapy as well as focus on the FDA's approval of rucaparib and its companion tumor profiling test, in the US. It will describe how women with deleterious mutations in the

Indexed as

BRCAovarian cancerPARP inhibitorrucaparibtargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID30464492
PMCPMC6223341
OpenAlexW2898683582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.