ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2018
Detection of cognitive impairment using a machine-learning algorithm.
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Physical activity, sleep disorders, and type of work in the prevention of cognitive function decline in patients with hypertension.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Paving the Way for Predicting the Progression of Cognitive Decline: The Potential Role of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Clinical Management of Neurodegenerative Disorders.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Detection of Alzheimer's Disease Using Logistic Regression and Clock Drawing Errors.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- A risk prediction model based on machine learning for early cognitive impairment in hypertension: Development and validation study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Comparison of RCF Scoring System to Clinical Decision for the Rey Complex Figure Using Machine-Learning Algorithm.Dementia and neurocognitive disorders · 2021Article
- A deep learning approach for monitoring parietal-dominant Alzheimer's disease in World Trade Center responders at midlife.Brain communications · 2021Article
- Detecting Cognitive Impairment Status Using Keystroke Patterns and Physical Activity Data among the Older Adults: A Machine Learning Approach.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- Brain Morphometry and Cognitive Performance in Normal Brain Aging: Age- and Sex-Related Structural and Functional Changes.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Prediction of cognitive impairment via deep learning trained with multi-center neuropsychological test data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- Machine Learning based Psychology: Advocating for A Data-Driven Approach.International journal of psychological researchArticle
- Machine-Learning Algorithms Based on Screening Tests for Mild Cognitive Impairment.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is one of the most frequently used bedside screening measures of cognition. However, the Korean Dementia Screening Questionnaire (KDSQ) is an easier and more reliable screening method. Instead, other clinical variables and raw data were used for this study without the consideration of a cutoff value. The objective of this study was to develop a machine-learning algorithm for the detection of cognitive impairment (CI) based on the KDSQ and the MMSE. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe original dataset from the Clinical Research Center for Dementia of South Korea study was obtained. In total, 9,885 and 300 patients were randomly allocated to the training and test datasets, respectively. We selected up to 24 variables including sex, age, education duration, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. We trained a machine-learning algorithm using TensorFlow based on the training dataset and then calculated its accuracy using the test dataset. The cost was calculated by conducting a logistic regression.
resultsThe accuracy of the model in predicting CI based on the KDSQ only, the MMSE only, and the combination of the KDSQ and MMSE was 84.3%, 88.3%, and 86.3%, respectively. For the KDSQ, the sensitivity for detecting CI was 91.50% and the specificity for detecting normal cognition (NL) was 59.60%. The sensitivity of the MMSE was 94.35%, and the specificity was 59.62%. When combining the KDSQ and the MMSE, the sensitivity for detecting CI was 91.5% and the specificity for detecting NL was 61.5%.
conclusionThe algorithm predicting CI based on the MMSE is superior. However, the KDSQ can be administered more easily in clinical practice and the algorithm using KDSQ is a comparable screening tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.