Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30464478›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2018

Detection of cognitive impairment using a machine-learning algorithm.

Young Chul Youn, Seong Hye Choi, Hae-Won Shin, Ko Woon Kim, Jae-Won Jang, Jason J Jung, Ging-Yuek Robin Hsiung, SangYun Kim

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Machine-Learning Algorithms Based on Screening Tests for Mild Cognitive Impairment.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Young Chul YounDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Seong Hye ChoiDepartment of Neurology, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea.
Hae-Won ShinDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Ko Woon KimDepartment of Neurology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Chonbuk, South Korea.
Jae-Won JangDepartment of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, South Korea.
Jason J JungDepartment of Computer Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Ging-Yuek Robin HsiungDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
SangYun KimDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, neuroksy@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is one of the most frequently used bedside screening measures of cognition. However, the Korean Dementia Screening Questionnaire (KDSQ) is an easier and more reliable screening method. Instead, other clinical variables and raw data were used for this study without the consideration of a cutoff value. The objective of this study was to develop a machine-learning algorithm for the detection of cognitive impairment (CI) based on the KDSQ and the MMSE. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe original dataset from the Clinical Research Center for Dementia of South Korea study was obtained. In total, 9,885 and 300 patients were randomly allocated to the training and test datasets, respectively. We selected up to 24 variables including sex, age, education duration, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. We trained a machine-learning algorithm using TensorFlow based on the training dataset and then calculated its accuracy using the test dataset. The cost was calculated by conducting a logistic regression.

resultsThe accuracy of the model in predicting CI based on the KDSQ only, the MMSE only, and the combination of the KDSQ and MMSE was 84.3%, 88.3%, and 86.3%, respectively. For the KDSQ, the sensitivity for detecting CI was 91.50% and the specificity for detecting normal cognition (NL) was 59.60%. The sensitivity of the MMSE was 94.35%, and the specificity was 59.62%. When combining the KDSQ and the MMSE, the sensitivity for detecting CI was 91.5% and the specificity for detecting NL was 61.5%.

conclusionThe algorithm predicting CI based on the MMSE is superior. However, the KDSQ can be administered more easily in clinical practice and the algorithm using KDSQ is a comparable screening tool.

Indexed as

dementiadementia questionnairemachine learningmild cognitive impairmentMini-Mental State ExaminationTensorFlow

Identifiers

PMID30464478
PMCPMC6219269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.