Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30464427›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2018

Treatment satisfaction with pharmaceutical interventions in Japanese adults with osteoarthritis and chronic knee pain: an analysis of a web-based survey.

Kaname Ueda, Nao Sasaki, Amir Goren, Shawna R Calhoun, Katsuhiro Shinjo, Hiroyuki Enomoto, Takeshi Muneta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kaname UedaHealth Outcomes/Health Technology Assessment/Real World Evidence, Eli Lilly Japan, Kobe, Japan, ueda_kaname@lilly.com.
Nao SasakiBio-Medicines, Medicines Development Unit, Eli Lilly Japan, Kobe, Japan.
Amir GorenHealth Outcomes, Kantar Health, New York, NY, USA.
Shawna R CalhounHealth Outcomes, Kantar Health, Horsham, PA, USA.
Katsuhiro ShinjoBio-Medicines, Medicines Development Unit, Eli Lilly Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki EnomotoBio-Medicines, Medicines Development Unit, Eli Lilly Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi MunetaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Eli Lilly (Japan) · JPKantar Health (United States) · USNational Disaster Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient satisfaction is an important outcome in successful osteoarthritis (OA) treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment satisfaction for medication (TSM) in people with knee OA (KOA), identify the factors predictive of treatment satisfaction, and describe the burden of illness. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis cross-sectional, patient-reported study used an Internet-based survey and analyzed responses of respondents with KOA (N=400) on characteristics including pain sites and levels (including pain ratings using the Numerical Rating Scale and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire), treatment satisfaction (Global, Effectiveness, and Convenience scores) based on the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9), and quality of life (QoL; based on the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2-Short Form). Respondents with only KOA (n=237) were compared with those having KOA and additional painful sites (KOA+; n=163). Factors predicting TSM were identified using multivariable linear regression analyses.

resultsRespondents with KOA were more likely to report intermittent pain for 3 months or more compared with those with KOA+ (58.6% vs 48.5%, respectively;

conclusionMedication treatment satisfaction rates were low among Japanese respondents with KOA. Given that lower pain, greater pain reduction post-medication, and meeting pain management expectations were predictive of higher satisfaction, treatment strategies that can better address pain may prove beneficial for overall patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticChronic PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePain ManagementPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAIMS2-SFknee osteoarthritisquality of lifeSF-MPQTSQM-9

Identifiers

PMID30464427
PMCPMC6211312
OpenAlexW2898603276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.