Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30464394›Full record

SynthesisDrug design, development and therapy2018

Clinical effectiveness of ranibizumab and conbercept for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis.

Luping Wang, Canwei Zhang, Rui Hua

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug design, development and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Recent advances in the study of Conbercept for diabetic macular edema.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Luping WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Canwei ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weifang Eye Hospital, Weifang, People's Republic of China.
Rui HuaDepartment of Ophthalmology, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China, woodshua@126.com.
China Medical University · CNUniversity of Bonn · DEWeifang People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo assess the ocular efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab and conbercept injection in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched PubMed, Wed of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Medline, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WANFANG DATA databases, up to June 20, 2018. We also searched abstracts and clinical study presentations at meetings as well as trial registries; we contacted authors of included studies if questions arose. Eligibility criteria for selection of studies were randomized controlled trials and retrospective trials that compared ranibizumab with conbercept for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

resultsEight randomized controlled trials and four retrospective studies were included with a total of 853 patients. Best-corrected visual acuity after loading dosage was improved in the conbercept group, compared with the ranibizumab group (weighted mean difference: -0.04; 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.00;

conclusionPooled evidence confirmed that conbercept was superior to ranibizumab with respect to visual gain after treatment. Additional studies with long-term follow-up are needed to support our conclusion.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsChoroidal NeovascularizationHumansMacular DegenerationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRanibizumabRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTreatment OutcomeAngiogenesis InhibitorsKH902 fusion proteinRanibizumabRecombinant Fusion Proteinsage-related macular degenerationbest-corrected visual acuitycentral macular thicknesschoroidal neovascularizationvision loss

Identifiers

PMID30464394
PMCPMC6211581
OpenAlexW2898477765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.