Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30464253›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Need for high-resolution Genetic Analysis in iPSC: Results and Lessons from the ForIPS Consortium.

Bernt Popp, Mandy Krumbiegel, Janina Grosch, Annika Sommer, Steffen Uebe, Zacharias Kohl, Sonja Plötz, Michaela Farrell, Udo Trautmann, Cornelia Kraus and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Challenges and opportunities to bridge translational to clinical research for personalized mitochondrial medicine.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Setting standards for stem cells.Nature methods · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. CRISPR-Cas9 correction of a nonsense mutation inMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Advances in 3D Organoid Models for Stem Cell-Based Cardiac Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernt PoppInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3679-1081
Mandy KrumbiegelInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Janina GroschDepartment of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, Erlangen, Germany.
Annika SommerDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Glückstrasse 6, Erlangen, Germany.
Steffen UebeInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Zacharias KohlDepartment of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4147-8866
Sonja PlötzDepartment of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, Erlangen, Germany.
Michaela FarrellDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Glückstrasse 6, Erlangen, Germany.
Udo TrautmannInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Cornelia KrausInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Arif B EkiciInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6099-7066
Reza AsadollahiInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1497-0564
Martin RegensburgerDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Glückstrasse 6, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-7386
Katharina GüntherStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Group, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Anita RauchInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Zurich, Switzerland.
Frank EdenhoferStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Group, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Jürgen WinklerDepartment of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, Erlangen, Germany.
Beate WinnerDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Glückstrasse 6, Erlangen, Germany.
André ReisInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. andre.reis@ukerlangen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6301-6363
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) GRK2162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic integrity of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) is essential for their validity as disease models and for potential therapeutic use. We describe the comprehensive analysis in the ForIPS consortium: an iPSC collection from donors with neurological diseases and healthy controls. Characterization included pluripotency confirmation, fingerprinting, conventional and molecular karyotyping in all lines. In the majority, somatic copy number variants (CNVs) were identified. A subset with available matched donor DNA was selected for comparative exome sequencing. We identified single nucleotide variants (SNVs) at different allelic frequencies in each clone with high variability in mutational load. Low frequencies of variants in parental fibroblasts highlight the importance of germline samples. Somatic variant number was independent from reprogramming, cell type and passage. Comparison with disease genes and prediction scores suggest biological relevance for some variants. We show that high-throughput sequencing has value beyond SNV detection and the requirement to individually evaluate each clone.

Indexed as

Genetic ProfileBiological Specimen BanksCell Culture TechniquesDNA FingerprintingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsKaryotypingSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID30464253
PMCPMC6249203
OpenAlexW2952488094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.