Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30464214›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2019

Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation for proteomics experiments.

Christopher S Hughes, Sophie Moggridge, Torsten Müller, Poul H Sorensen, Gregg B Morin, Jeroen Krijgsveld

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,130 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,130citing papers in PubMed
37.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,130 citing papers in PubMed, 1,896 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Proteomic analysis may explain differences inPlant signaling & behavior · 2026
    Article
  3. GutGut microbes · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,070 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher S HughesCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada. chughes@bcgsc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6980-4459
Sophie MoggridgeCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Torsten MüllerDivision Proteomics of Stem Cells and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Poul H SorensenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Gregg B MorinCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8949-4374
Jeroen KrijgsveldDivision Proteomics of Stem Cells and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. j.krijgsveld@dkfz.de.
German Cancer Research Center · DECanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical step in proteomics analysis is the optimal extraction and processing of protein material to ensure the highest sensitivity in downstream detection. Achieving this requires a sample-handling technology that exhibits unbiased protein manipulation, flexibility in reagent use, and virtually lossless processing. Addressing these needs, the single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample-preparation (SP3) technology is a paramagnetic bead-based approach for rapid, robust, and efficient processing of protein samples for proteomic analysis. SP3 uses a hydrophilic interaction mechanism for exchange or removal of components that are commonly used to facilitate cell or tissue lysis, protein solubilization, and enzymatic digestion (e.g., detergents, chaotropes, salts, buffers, acids, and solvents) before downstream proteomic analysis. The SP3 protocol consists of nonselective protein binding and rinsing steps that are enabled through the use of ethanol-driven solvation capture on the surface of hydrophilic beads, and elution of purified material in aqueous conditions. In contrast to alternative approaches, SP3 combines compatibility with a substantial collection of solution additives with virtually lossless and unbiased recovery of proteins independent of input quantity, all in a simplified single-tube protocol. The SP3 protocol is simple and efficient, and can be easily completed by a standard user in ~30 min, including reagent preparation. As a result of these properties, SP3 has successfully been used to facilitate examination of a broad range of sample types spanning simple and complex protein mixtures in large and very small amounts, across numerous organisms. This work describes the steps and extensive considerations involved in performing SP3 in bottom-up proteomics, using a simplified protein cleanup scenario for illustration.

Indexed as

BuffersChemical FractionationDetergentsGuanidineHEK293 CellsHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsIsothiocyanatesProteomeProteomicsSolid Phase MicroextractionSolventsSpecimen HandlingUreaBuffersDetergentsGuanidineIsothiocyanatesisothiocyanic acidProteomeSolventsUrea

Identifiers

PMID30464214
OpenAlexW2900884817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.