Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30463953›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

The calculation of transcript flux ratios reveals single regulatory mechanisms capable of activation and repression.

Eric A Galburt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Structural origins ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A majority ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric A GalburtBiochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63108 egalburt@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4314-3215
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

INVESTIGATING NOVEL MECHANISMS OF TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION REGULATION IN MYCOBACTERIAR01GM107544 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GALBURT, ERIC A, STALLINGS, CHRISTINA LEIGH · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regulation of transcription allows cells to adjust the rate of RNA polymerases (RNAPs) initiated in a promoter-specific manner. Classically, transcription factors are directed to a subset of promoters via the recognition of DNA sequence motifs. However, a unique class of regulators is recruited directly through interactions with RNAP. Surprisingly, these factors may still possess promoter specificity, and it has been postulated that the same kinetic mechanism leads to different regulatory outcomes depending on a promoter's basal rate constants. However, mechanistic studies of regulation typically report factor activity in terms of changes in the thermodynamics or kinetics of individual steps or states while qualitatively linking these observations to measured changes in transcript production. Here, I present online calculators that allow for the direct testing of mechanistic hypotheses by calculating the steady-state transcript flux in the presence and absence of a factor as a function of initiation rate constants. By evaluating how the flux ratio of a single kinetic mechanism varies across promoter space, quantitative insights into the potential of a mechanism to generate promoter-specific regulatory outcomes are obtained. Using these calculations, I predict that the mycobacterial transcription factor CarD is capable of repression in addition to its known role as an activator of ribosomal genes. In addition, a modification of the mechanism of the stringent response factors DksA/guanosine 5'-diphosphate 3'-diphosphate (ppGpp) is proposed based on their ability to differentially regulate transcription across promoter space. Overall, I conclude that a multifaceted kinetic mechanism is a requirement for differential regulation by this class of factors.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialTranscription, GeneticBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEpigenetic RepressionGuanosine TetraphosphateKineticsModels, BiologicalMycobacterium tuberculosisPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, BacterialThermodynamicsTranscriptional ActivationTranscription FactorsBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesGuanosine TetraphosphateRNA, BacterialTranscription FactorsCarDDksAkineticsregulationtranscription

Identifiers

PMID30463953
PMCPMC6294943
OpenAlexW2901183331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.