Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30463949›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Evolution of host support for two ancient bacterial symbionts with differentially degraded genomes in a leafhopper host.

Meng Mao, Xiushuai Yang, Gordon M Bennett

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Complete genomes of mutualistic bacterial co-symbionts "Microbiology resource announcements · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genetic innovations in animal-microbe symbioses.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meng MaoDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343; mmao3@ucmerced.edu.
Xiushuai YangDepartment of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822.
Gordon M BennettDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343.
University of California, Merced · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant sap-feeding insects (Hemiptera) rely on bacterial symbionts for nutrition absent in their diets. These bacteria experience extreme genome reduction and require genetic resources from their hosts, particularly for basic cellular processes other than nutrition synthesis. The host-derived mechanisms that complete these processes have remained poorly understood. It is also unclear how hosts meet the distinct needs of multiple bacterial partners with differentially degraded genomes. To address these questions, we investigated the cell-specific gene-expression patterns in the symbiotic organs of the aster leafhopper (ALF),

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialAnimalsBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBacteroidetesBetaproteobacteriaGene DuplicationGene Transfer, HorizontalGenome, InsectHemipteraHost Microbial InteractionsSymbiosisTranscriptomeDNA replication and repaireukaryotic genome evolutionnutritional symbiosistranscriptiontranslation

Identifiers

PMID30463949
PMCPMC6294904
OpenAlexW2900474457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.