ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2019
Field Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy of a Low-Cost Instrument-Free Point-of-Care CD4 Test (Visitect CD4) Performed by Different Health Worker Cadres among Pregnant Women.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- VISITECT® CD4 advanced disease assay in routine use: Diagnostic accuracy and usability, Ethiopia and Indonesia.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2025Article
- Evaluation of whole blood CD64 for identifying infection in neonates receiving hospital care.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Article
- Amplifying Lateral Flow Assay Signals for Rapid Detection of COVID-19 Specific Antibodies.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2022Article
- User perspectives and preferences on a novel TB LAM diagnostic (Fujifilm SILVAMP TB LAM)-a qualitative study in Malawi and Zambia.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- A point-of-care lateral flow assay for neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.EBioMedicine · 2021Article
- Advanced HIV disease during the 'Treat All' era in Botswana.AIDS (London, England) · 2020Article
- Performance characteristics of an instrument-free point-of-care CD4 test (VISITECT®CD4) for use in resource-limited settings.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- An inkjet-printed polysaccharide matrix for on-chip sample preparation in point-of-care cell counting chambers.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Qualitative assessment of South African healthcare worker perspectives on an instrument-free rapid CD4 test.BMC health services research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measuring CD4 counts remains an important component of HIV care. The Visitect CD4 is the first instrument-free low-cost point-of-care CD4 test with results interpreted visually after 40 min, providing a result of ≥350 CD4 cells/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.