Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30463895›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2019

Multicenter Evaluation of NeuMoDx Group B

C L Emery, R F Relich, T H Davis, S A Young, M D Sims, B L Boyanton

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Multicenter evaluation of the NeuMoDx™ SARS-CoV-2 Test.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020
    Article
  7. Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C L EmeryDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA clemery@iu.edu.
R F RelichDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
T H DavisDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
S A YoungTriCore Reference Laboratories and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
M D SimsDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.
B L BoyantonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group B

Indexed as

AdultCarrier StateFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousProspective StudiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRectumSensitivity and SpecificityStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus agalactiaeVaginaGBSgroup B StreptococcusLim brothneonatal sepsisreal-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID30463895
PMCPMC6355512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.