ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019
New
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Multifaceted Defenses Against Parasitoid Wasps in Diptera.Annual review of genetics · 2025Review
- Gut microbiome and host TOR pathway interact to regulate predator-induced aversive memory inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Screening for Differentially Expressed Memory Genes on a Diabetes Model Induced by High-Sugar Diet in Drosophila melanogaster: Potential Markers for Memory Deficits.Molecular neurobiology · 2024Article
- A Similarity-Based Method for Predicting Enzymatic Functions in Yeast Uncovers a New AMP Hydrolase.Journal of molecular biology · 2022Article
- The field of protein function prediction as viewed by different domain scientists.Bioinformatics advances · 2022Article
- The gut-microbiota-brain axis in autism: what Drosophila models can offer?Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2021Review
- Plasticity and modulation of olfactory circuits in insects.Cell and tissue research · 2021Review
- Blinded Testing of Function Annotation for uPE1 Proteins by I-TASSER/COFACTOR Pipeline Using the 2018-2019 Additions to neXtProt and the CAFA3 Challenge.Journal of proteome research · 2019Article
- The CAFA challenge reports improved protein function prediction and new functional annotations for hundreds of genes through experimental screens.Genome biology · 2019Article
- Transgeneratonal inheritance of ethanol preference is caused by maternal NPF repression.eLife · 2019Article
- Neural circuitry of social learning in Drosophila requires multiple inputs to facilitate inter-species communication.Communications biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A major bottleneck to our understanding of the genetic and molecular foundation of life lies in the ability to assign function to a gene and, subsequently, a protein. Traditional molecular and genetic experiments can provide the most reliable forms of identification, but are generally low-throughput, making such discovery and assignment a daunting task. The bottleneck has led to an increasing role for computational approaches. The Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA) effort seeks to measure the performance of computational methods. In CAFA3, we performed selected screens, including an effort focused on long-term memory. We used homology and previous CAFA predictions to identify 29 key
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.