Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30463838›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

Impact of a Wearable Device-Based Walking Programs in Rural Older Adults on Physical Activity and Health Outcomes: Cohort Study.

Il-Young Jang, Hae Reong Kim, Eunju Lee, Hee-Won Jung, Hyelim Park, Seon-Hee Cheon, Young Soo Lee, Yu Rang Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. CIM-Based Smart Pose Detection Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Il-Young JangDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3617-3301
Hae Reong KimDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2079-0498
Eunju LeeDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4612-0625
Hee-Won JungGraduate School of Medical Science And Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute Of Science And Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2583-3354
Hyelim ParkDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9125-158X
Seon-Hee CheonPyeongchang Health Center & Country Hospital, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1056-3654
Young Soo LeeDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1278-4597
Yu Rang ParkDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4210-2094

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-dwelling older adults living in rural areas are in a less favorable environment for health care compared with urban older adults. We believe that intermittent coaching through wearable devices can help optimize health care for older adults in medically limited environments.

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate whether a wearable device and mobile-based intermittent coaching or self-management could increase physical activity and health outcomes of small groups of older adults in rural areas.

methodsTo address the above evaluation goal, we carried out the "Smart Walk" program, a health care model wherein a wearable device is used to promote self-exercise particularly among community-dwelling older adults managed by a community health center. We randomly selected older adults who had enrolled in a population-based, prospective cohort study of aging, the Aging Study of Pyeongchang Rural Area. The "Smart Walk" program was a 13-month program conducted from March 2017 to March 2018 and included 6 months of coaching, 1 month of rest, and 6 months of self-management. We evaluated differences in physical activity and health outcomes according to frailty status and conducted pre- and postanalyses of the Smart Walk program. We also performed intergroup analysis according to adherence of wearable devices.

resultsWe recruited 22 participants (11 robust and 11 prefrail older adults). The two groups were similar in most of the variables, except for age, frailty index, and Short Physical Performance Battery score associated with frailty criteria. After a 6-month coaching program, the prefrail group showed significant improvement in usual gait speed (mean 0.73 [SD 0.11] vs mean 0.96 [SD 0.27], P=.02), International Physical Activity Questionnaire scores in kcal (mean 2790.36 [SD 2224.62] vs mean 7589.72 [SD 4452.52], P=.01), and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions score (mean 0.84 [SD 0.07] vs mean 0.90 [SD 0.07], P=.02), although no significant improvement was found in the robust group. The average total step count was significantly different and was approximately four times higher in the coaching period than in the self-management period (5,584,295.83 vs 1,289,084.66, P<.001). We found that participants in the "long-self" group who used the wearable device for the longest time showed increased body weight and body mass index by mean 0.65 (SD 1.317) and mean 0.097 (SD 0.513), respectively, compared with the other groups.

conclusionsOur "Smart Walk" program improved physical fitness, anthropometric measurements, and geriatric assessment categories in a small group of older adults in rural areas with limited resources for monitoring. Further validation through various rural public health centers and in a large number of rural older adults is required.

Indexed as

adherencefrailtyolder adultrural areawearable device

Identifiers

PMID30463838
PMCPMC6282012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.