ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Drug repositioning using drug-disease vectors based on an integrated network.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- A directed weighted network-based method for drug combinations identification using drug-target and inter-target regulation.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Analysis of transcription profiles for the identification of master regulators as the key players in glioblastoma.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Better understanding the phenotypic effects of drugs through shared targets in genetic disease networks.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Drug repurposing and prediction of multiple interaction types via graph embedding.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- A network-biology led computational drug repurposing strategy to prioritize therapeutic options for COVID-19.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Targets preliminary screening for the fresh natural drug molecule based on Cosine-correlation and similarity-comparison of local network.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- PPDTS: Predicting potential drug-target interactions based on network similarity.IET systems biology · 2022Article
- Evaluating the performance of drug-repurposing technologies.Drug discovery today · 2022Review
- Overview of methods for characterization and visualization of a protein-protein interaction network in a multi-omics integration context.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- DLS: A Link Prediction Method Based on Network Local Structure for Predicting Drug-Protein Interactions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Predicting associations among drugs, targets and diseases by tensor decomposition for drug repositioning.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- The assessment of efficient representation of drug features using deep learning for drug repositioning.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiverse interactions occur between biomolecules, such as activation, inhibition, expression, or repression. However, previous network-based studies of drug repositioning have employed interaction on the binary protein-protein interaction (PPI) network without considering the characteristics of the interactions. Recently, some studies of drug repositioning using gene expression data found that associations between drug and disease genes are useful information for identifying novel drugs to treat diseases. However, the gene expression profiles for drugs and diseases are not always available. Although gene expression profiles of drugs and diseases are available, existing methods cannot use the drugs or diseases, when differentially expressed genes in the profiles are not included in their network.
resultsWe developed a novel method for identifying candidate indications of existing drugs considering types of interactions between biomolecules based on known drug-disease associations. To obtain associations between drug and disease genes, we constructed a directed network using protein interaction and gene regulation data obtained from various public databases providing diverse biological pathways. The network includes three types of edges depending on relationships between biomolecules. To quantify the association between a target gene and a disease gene, we explored the shortest paths from the target gene to the disease gene and calculated the types and weights of the shortest paths. For each drug-disease pair, we built a vector consisting of values for each disease gene influenced by the drug. Using the vectors and known drug-disease associations, we constructed classifiers to identify novel drugs for each disease.
conclusionWe propose a method for exploring candidate drugs of diseases using associations between drugs and disease genes derived from a directed gene network instead of gene regulation data obtained from gene expression profiles. Compared to existing methods that require information on gene relationships and gene expression data, our method can be applied to a greater number of drugs and diseases. Furthermore, to validate our predictions, we compared the predictions with drug-disease pairs in clinical trials using the hypergeometric test, which showed significant results. Our method also showed better performance compared to existing methods for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.