Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30463330›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2018

Feedback-Based Treatments for Eating Disorders and Related Symptoms: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Claudio Imperatori, Miranda Mancini, Giacomo Della Marca, Enrico Maria Valenti, Benedetto Farina

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudio ImperatoriDepartment of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, Via degli Aldobrandeschi 190, 00163 Roma, Italy. imperatori.c@libero.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8207-6919
Miranda ManciniDepartment of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, Via degli Aldobrandeschi 190, 00163 Roma, Italy. mancini.miranda@gmail.com.
Giacomo Della MarcaSleep Disorders Unit, Institute of Neurology, Catholic University, 00153 Rome, Italy. giacomodellamarca@gmail.com.
Enrico Maria ValentiDepartment of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, Via degli Aldobrandeschi 190, 00163 Roma, Italy. enricomaria.valenti@gmail.com.
Benedetto FarinaDepartment of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, Via degli Aldobrandeschi 190, 00163 Roma, Italy. benfarina@gmail.com.
European University of Rome · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of biofeedback and neurofeedback has been investigated in a range of psychiatric disorders. However, to date, there are few studies on the clinical usefulness of feedback-based techniques for eating disorders (EDs) and EDs-related symptoms (e.g., food craving). A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and PsychINFO identified 162 articles. Among these, thirteen studies exploring the therapeutic use of biofeedback and neurofeedback in EDs or EDs-related symptoms were included. Biofeedback and neurofeedback were implemented respectively in five and eight of all reviewed articles. No studies incorporated different feedback modalities or both biofeedback and neurofeedback. The considered studies provide preliminary data of the usefulness of feedback-based techniques in the treatment of several dysfunctional eating behaviors (e.g., food craving, rumination). Although no significant effect has been reported for other important EDs-related symptoms (i.e., body image disturbance), feedback-based techniques are also associated with significant modifications of both sympathetic reaction to food-related stimuli and brain activity in several regions of the reward system (e.g., insula). Taken together the results of the present review suggest that feedback-based treatments may be useful in the treatment of several dysfunctional eating behaviors operating both on top-down and bottom-up individual coping strategies. Methodological and clinical issues are also discussed.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologyNeurofeedbackBody ImageCravingElectroencephalographyFeeding and Eating DisordersFeeding BehaviorFoodHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingbiofeedbackeating disorderseating disorders-related symptomsEEG-NeurofeedbackfMRI-Neurofeedbackpsychophysiology

Identifiers

PMID30463330
PMCPMC6265864
OpenAlexW2901795049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.