Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30463318›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

EGFET-Based Sensors for Bioanalytical Applications: A Review.

Salvatore Andrea Pullano, Costantino Davide Critello, Ifana Mahbub, Nishat Tarannum Tasneem, Samira Shamsir, Syed Kamrul Islam, Marta Greco, Antonino S Fiorillo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Effect of Electrode Modification with Chitosan and NafionMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Salvatore Andrea PullanoDepartment of Health Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy. pullano@unicz.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3391-1698
Costantino Davide CritelloDepartment of Health Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy. critello@unicz.it.
Ifana MahbubDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA. Ifana.Mahbub@unt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5561-0880
Nishat Tarannum TasneemDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA. NishatTarannumTasneem@my.unt.edu.
Samira ShamsirDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. sshamsir@mail.missouri.edu.
Syed Kamrul IslamDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. islams@missouri.edu.
Marta GrecoDepartment of Health Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy. marta.greco@unicz.it.
Antonino S FiorilloDepartment of Health Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy. nino@unicz.it.
Magna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the 1970s, a great deal of attention has been paid to the development of semiconductor-based biosensors because of the numerous advantages they offer, including high sensitivity, faster response time, miniaturization, and low-cost manufacturing for quick biospecific analysis with reusable features. Commercial biosensors have become highly desirable in the fields of medicine, food, and environmental monitoring as well as military applications, whereas increasing concerns about food safety and health issues have resulted in the introduction of novel legislative standards for these sensors. Numerous devices have been developed for monitoring biological processes such as nucleic acid hybridization, protein⁻protein interaction, antigen⁻antibody bonds, and substrate⁻enzyme reactions, just to name a few. Since the 1980s, scientific interest moved to the development of semiconductor-based devices, which also include integrated front-end electronics, such as the extended-gate field-effect transistor (EGFET) biosensor, one of the first miniaturized chemical sensors. This work is intended to be a review of the state of the art focused on the development of biosensors and chemosensors based on extended-gate field-effect transistor within the field of bioanalytical applications, which will highlight the most recent research reported in the literature. Moreover, a comparison among the diverse EGFET devices will be presented, giving particular attention to the materials and technologies.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesCalciumDNAElectrochemical TechniquesGlucoseHumansMiniaturizationTransistors, ElectronicUreaCalciumDNAGlucoseUreaantigen–antibody biosensorchemosensorDNA–DNA biosensorEGFETelectrochemical cellenzymatic biosensorimmunosensorionic sensorISFET

Identifiers

PMID30463318
PMCPMC6263563
OpenAlexW2900514596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.