Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30463095›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2018

The Impact of a Location-Sensing Electronic Health Record on Clinician Efficiency and Accuracy: A Pilot Simulation Study.

Kevin King, John Quarles, Vaishnavi Ravi, Tanvir Irfan Chowdhury, Donia Friday, Craig Sisson, Yusheng Feng

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin KingDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States.
John QuarlesDepartment of Computer Science, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States.
Vaishnavi RaviDepartment of Computer Science, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States.
Tanvir Irfan ChowdhuryDepartment of Computer Science, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States.
Donia FridayDepartment of Pediatrics, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, San Antonio, Texas, United States.
Craig SissonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States.
Yusheng FengDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States.
The University of Texas at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USSan Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThrough the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, the federal government invested $26 billion in electronic health records (EHRs) to improve physician performance and patient safety; however, these systems have not met expectations. One of the cited issues with EHRs is the human-computer interaction, as exhibited by the excessive number of interactions with the interface, which reduces clinician efficiency. In contrast, real-time location systems (RTLS)-technologies that can track the location of people and objects-have been shown to increase clinician efficiency. RTLS can improve patient flow in part through the optimization of patient verification activities. However, the data collected by RTLS have not been effectively applied to optimize interaction with EHR systems.

objectivesWe conducted a pilot study with the intention of improving the human-computer interaction of EHR systems by incorporating a RTLS. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of RTLS on process metrics (i.e., provider time, number of rooms searched to find a patient, and the number of interactions with the computer interface), and the outcome metric of patient identification accuracy

methodsA pilot study was conducted in a simulated emergency department using a locally developed camera-based RTLS-equipped EHR that detected the proximity of subjects to simulated patients and displayed patient information when subjects entered the exam rooms. Ten volunteers participated in 10 patient encounters with the RTLS activated (RTLS-A) and then deactivated (RTLS-D). Each volunteer was monitored and actions recorded by trained observers. We sought a 50% improvement in time to locate patients, number of rooms searched to locate patients, and the number of mouse clicks necessary to perform those tasks.

resultsThe time required to locate patients (RTLS-A = 11.9 ± 2.0 seconds vs. RTLS-D = 36.0 ± 5.7 seconds,

conclusionThis pilot demonstrated in simulation that an EHR equipped with real-time location services improved performance in locating patients and reduced error compared with an EHR without RTLS. Furthermore, RTLS decreased the number of mouse clicks required to access information. This study suggests EHRs equipped with real-time location services that automates patient location and other repetitive tasks may improve physician efficiency, and ultimately, patient safety.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceComputer SimulationElectronic Health RecordsPhysiciansRemote Sensing TechnologyComputer SystemsHumansPilot ProjectsSmartphoneTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID30463095
PMCPMC6249134
OpenAlexW2901411198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.