Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30462743›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

High-density multi-population consensus genetic linkage map for peach.

Cassia da Silva Linge, Laima Antanaviciute, Asma Abdelghafar, Pere Arús, Daniele Bassi, Laura Rossini, Stephen Ficklin, Ksenija Gasic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A novel high-density grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) integrated linkage map using GBS in a half-diallel population.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Cassia da Silva LingeClemson University, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson, SC, United States of America.
Laima AntanaviciuteClemson University, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson, SC, United States of America.
Asma AbdelghafarClemson University, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson, SC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4813-7770
Pere ArúsInstitut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Centre de Recerca en Agrigenòmica Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)-IRTA-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB)-University of Barcelona (UB), Campus UAB, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Spain.
Daniele BassiUniversità degli Studi di Milano, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences-Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Milan, Italy.
Laura RossiniUniversità degli Studi di Milano, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences-Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6509-9177
Stephen FicklinWashington State University, Department of Horticulture, Pullman, WA, United States of America.
Ksenija GasicClemson University, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson, SC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4391-5262
Clemson University · USUniversity of Milan · ITUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highly saturated genetic linkage maps are extremely helpful to breeders and are an essential prerequisite for many biological applications such as the identification of marker-trait associations, mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL), candidate gene identification, development of molecular markers for marker-assisted selection (MAS) and comparative genetic studies. Several high-density genetic maps, constructed using the 9K SNP peach array, are available for peach. However, each of these maps is based on a single mapping population and has limited use for QTL discovery and comparative studies. A consensus genetic linkage map developed from multiple populations provides not only a higher marker density and a greater genome coverage when compared to the individual maps, but also serves as a valuable tool for estimating genetic positions of unmapped markers. In this study, a previously developed linkage map from the cross between two peach cultivars 'Zin Dai' and 'Crimson Lady' (ZC2) was improved by genotyping additional progenies. In addition, a peach consensus map was developed based on the combination of the improved ZC2 genetic linkage map with three existing high-density genetic maps of peach and a reference map of Prunus. A total of 1,476 SNPs representing 351 unique marker positions were mapped across eight linkage groups on the ZC2 genetic map. The ZC2 linkage map spans 483.3 cM with an average distance between markers of 1.38 cM/marker. The MergeMap and LPmerge tools were used for the construction of a consensus map based on markers shared across five genetic linkage maps. The consensus linkage map contains a total of 3,092 molecular markers, consisting of 2,975 SNPs, 116 SSRs and 1 morphological marker associated with slow ripening in peach (SR). The consensus map provides valuable information on marker order and genetic position for QTL identification in peach and other genetic studies within Prunus and Rosaceae.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingAlgorithmsConsensusGenotyping TechniquesHybridization, GeneticOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrunus persica

Identifiers

PMID30462743
PMCPMC6248993
OpenAlexW2901327188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.