Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30462677›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

New insertion method of transnasal ileus tube for small bowel obstruction: Anterior balloon method.

Daisuke Yamaguchi, Kei Ikeda, Yuki Takeuchi, Rikako Kinoshita, Toru Higuchi, Hiroko Fukuda, Naoyuki Tominaga, Tomohito Morisaki, Keisuke Ario, Seiji Tsunada and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daisuke YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9782-9998
Kei IkedaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Yuki TakeuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Rikako KinoshitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Toru HiguchiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.
Hiroko FukudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Naoyuki TominagaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.
Tomohito MorisakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Keisuke ArioDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Seiji TsunadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Hisako YoshidaDepartment of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuma FujimotoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.
National Hospital Organization · JPOsaka City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall bowel obstruction (SBO) is usually caused by postoperative adhesions and malignant disease, and decompression is effective for SBO. Our previous case report suggested that a new transnasal ileus tube insertion method, the anterior balloon method (ABM), could achieve decompression for adhesive SBO.

aimsThe study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a new method for inserting transnasal ileus tubes in patients with SBO.

methodsAltogether, 134 patients with small bowel obstruction treated from January 2011 to December 2017 were reviewed. The patients were categorized into two groups: those with the new method that inserts an anterior balloon (ABM group: 52 patients, 2014-2017) versus those with the ordinary insertion method (OIM group: 82 patients, 2011-2014).

resultsThe patients' characteristics and symptoms on admission were similar in the ABM and OIM groups. Adhesions were the main cause of ileus in the two groups. The insertion time duration was significantly shorter in the ABM group than in OIM group (28.4 ± 9.1 vs. 33.5 ± 13.0 min; p = 0.01). The ABM group also had significantly longer tubes than OIM group (222.4 ± 32.2 vs. 157.4 ± 31.7 cm; p < 0.001), which resulted in a significantly shorter time until clinical symptoms were relieved in ABM group. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the two groups.

conclusionsThe ABM group had shorter insertion duration and longer tubes than those of OIM group. The ABM might become a preferred therapeutic choice to achieve decompression in patients with SBO.

Indexed as

AgedDecompression, SurgicalFemaleHumansIntestinal ObstructionIntestine, SmallMaleNasal CavityNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryRetrospective StudiesTissue AdhesionsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30462677
PMCPMC6248956
OpenAlexW2901796319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.