Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30462359›Full record

ArticleAging cell2019

The bystander effect contributes to the accumulation of senescent cells in vivo.

Paulo F L da Silva, Mikolaj Ogrodnik, Olena Kucheryavenko, Julien Glibert, Satomi Miwa, Kerry Cameron, Abbas Ishaq, Gabriele Saretzki, Sushma Nagaraja-Grellscheid, Glyn Nelson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging cell, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Senescent-Like Myofibers Contribute to Anti-Regenerative Cytokine Signaling in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paulo F L da SilvaThe ABC - Newcastle University Ageing Biology Centre, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Mikolaj OgrodnikThe ABC - Newcastle University Ageing Biology Centre, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Olena KucheryavenkoThe ABC - Newcastle University Ageing Biology Centre, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Julien GlibertThe ABC - Newcastle University Ageing Biology Centre, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Satomi MiwaThe ABC - Newcastle University Ageing Biology Centre, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Kerry CameronThe ABC - Newcastle University Ageing Biology Centre, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Abbas IshaqThe ABC - Newcastle University Ageing Biology Centre, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Gabriele SaretzkiThe ABC - Newcastle University Ageing Biology Centre, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Sushma Nagaraja-GrellscheidDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Glyn NelsonThe ABC - Newcastle University Ageing Biology Centre, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Thomas von ZglinickiThe ABC - Newcastle University Ageing Biology Centre, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBNewcastle Hospitals - Campus for Ageing and Vitality · GBDurham University · GBNear East University · CY

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C008200/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F010966/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I020748/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K019260/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S006710/1Cancer Research UK 24009Cancer Research UK C12161/A24009Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Senescent cells accumulate with age in multiple tissues and may cause age-associated disease and functional decline. In vitro, senescent cells induce senescence in bystander cells. To see how important this bystander effect may be for accumulation of senescent cells in vivo, we xenotransplanted senescent cells into skeletal muscle and skin of immunocompromised NSG mice. 3 weeks after the last transplantation, mouse dermal fibroblasts and myofibres displayed multiple senescence markers in the vicinity of transplanted senescent cells, but not where non-senescent or no cells were injected. Adjacent to injected senescent cells, the magnitude of the bystander effect was similar to the increase in senescence markers in myofibres between 8 and 32 months of age. The age-associated increase of senescence markers in muscle correlated with fibre thinning, a widely used marker of muscle aging and sarcopenia. Senescent cell transplantation resulted in borderline induction of centrally nucleated fibres and no significant thinning, suggesting that myofibre aging might be a delayed consequence of senescence-like signalling. To assess the relative importance of the bystander effect versus cell-autonomous senescence, we compared senescent hepatocyte frequencies in livers of wild-type and NSG mice under ad libitum and dietary restricted feeding. This enabled us to approximate cell-autonomous and bystander-driven senescent cell accumulation as well as the impact of immunosurveillance separately. The results suggest a significant impact of the bystander effect for accumulation of senescent hepatocytes in liver and indicate that senostatic interventions like dietary restriction may act as senolytics in immunocompetent animals.

Indexed as

Bystander EffectCellular SenescenceAnimalsBiomarkersDermisFibroblastsHumansLiverMaleMice, Inbred C57BLModels, BiologicalMuscle Fibers, SkeletalPhenotypeTransplantation, HeterologousBiomarkersagingbystandermusclesenescenceskin

Identifiers

PMID30462359
PMCPMC6351849
OpenAlexW2900903241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.