Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30462334›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2019

In vitro culture and characterization of duck primordial germ cells.

Yi-Chen Chen, Shau-Ping Lin, Yi-Ying Chang, Wei-Peng Chang, Liang-Yuan Wei, Hsiu-Chou Liu, Jeng-Fang Huang, Bertrand Pain, Shinn-Chih Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Eye pigmentation-based in-ovo chicken sexing via precision breeding.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Manipulating primordial germ cells from chicken and other bird species.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yi-Chen ChenInstitute of Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10672, Taiwan.
Shau-Ping LinInstitute of Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10672, Taiwan.
Yi-Ying ChangIlan Branch, Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Ilan 26846, Taiwan.
Wei-Peng ChangIlan Branch, Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Ilan 26846, Taiwan.
Liang-Yuan WeiIlan Branch, Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Ilan 26846, Taiwan.
Hsiu-Chou LiuIlan Branch, Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Ilan 26846, Taiwan.
Jeng-Fang HuangIlan Branch, Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Ilan 26846, Taiwan.
Bertrand PainUniv Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, U1208, USC1361, INSERM, INRA, Bron 69500, France.
Shinn-Chih WuInstitute of Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10672, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to isolate, culture, and characterize duck primordial germ cells (PGCs) and to compare these cells with chicken PGCs. We first cultured Muscovy duck (Cairina moschata) circulating PGCs and gonadal PGCs (gPGCs) in the modified serum-containing medium used to amplify chicken PGCs. gPGCs were found to proliferate better in serum-free chemically defined medium than in serum-containing medium. Thereafter, gPGCs were similarly isolated from 2 other duck breeds, the Pekin duck (Anas platyrhynchos) and the hybrid mule duck (C. moschata × A. platyrhynchos), and amplified for a limited period of time in the chemically defined culture condition, but sufficiently to be characterized and transplanted. Cultured gPGCs of all 3 duck breeds were characterized by Periodic acid-Schiff staining, immunocytochemical staining, and expression analysis of germline-specific and pluripotency genes. Cultured duck gPGCs colonized the gonads after being genetically labeled and injected into recipient embryos. Taken together, these results demonstrate that duck PGCs retain their germline characteristics after being isolated, expanded in vitro, and genetically modified. Further studies are required to establish the optimal conditions for long-term culture of duck PGCs, which may involve supplementing the culture medium with other growth factors or compounds.

Indexed as

DucksAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesGerm CellsGonadsmule duck (C. moschata × A. platyrhynchos)Muscovy duck (Cairina moschata)Pekin duck (Anas platyrhynchos)primordial germ cell (PGC)

Identifiers

PMID30462334
PMCPMC6414036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.