Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30462260›Full record

Trial reportJournal of travel medicine2018

Rifamycin SV-MMX® for treatment of travellers' diarrhea: equally effective as ciprofloxacin and not associated with the acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria.

Robert Steffen, Zhi-Dong Jiang, Mónica L Gracias Garcia, Prithi Araujo, Michael Stiess, Tanju Nacak, Roland Greinwald, Herbert L DuPont

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of travel medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Outbreak of Diarrhea Caused by a NovelOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Health risk of travel for chronic kidney disease patients.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. FDA approved antibacterial drugs: 2018-2019.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania) · 2019
    Review
  12. Rifamycin SV MMXClinical drug investigation · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Robert SteffenDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, WHO Collaborating Centre for Travellers' Health, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Zhi-Dong JiangDivision of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Sciences and Center for Infectious Diseases, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
Mónica L Gracias GarciaPrivate Clinica, Quetzaltenango, Guatemala.
Prithi AraujoMedical Department, NUSI Wockhardt Hospital, Cuncolim, Margao, Goa, India.
Michael StiessResearch and Development, Dr Falk Pharma GmbH, Freiburg, Germany.
Tanju NacakResearch and Development, Dr Falk Pharma GmbH, Freiburg, Germany.
Roland GreinwaldResearch and Development, Dr Falk Pharma GmbH, Freiburg, Germany.
Herbert L DuPontDivision of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Sciences and Center for Infectious Diseases, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
Dr Falk Pharma (Germany) · DEThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Zurich · CHWockhardt Hospitals · IN

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The novel oral antibiotic formulation Rifamycin SV-MMX®, with a targeted delivery to the distal small bowel and colon, was superior to placebo in treating travellers' diarrhea (TD) in a previous study. Thus, a study was designed to compare this poorly absorbed antibiotic with the systemic agent ciprofloxacin. Methods: In a randomized double-blind phase 3 study (ERASE), the efficacy and safety of Rifamycin SV-MMX® 400 mg twice daily (RIF-MMX) was compared with ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily in the oral treatment of TD. Overall, 835 international visitors to India, Guatemala or Ecuador with acute TD were randomized to receive a 3-day treatment with RIF-MMX (n = 420) or ciprofloxacin (n = 415). Primary endpoint was time to last unformed stool (TLUS), after which clinical cure was declared. Stools samples for microbiological evaluation were collected at the baseline visit and the end of treatment visit. Results: Median TLUS in the RIF-MMX group was 42.8 h versus 36.8 h in the ciprofloxacin group indicating non-inferiority of RIF-MMX to ciprofloxacin (P = 0.0035). Secondary efficacy endpoint results including clinical cure rate, treatment failure rate, requirement of rescue therapy as well as microbiological eradication rate confirmed those of the primary analysis indicating equal efficacy for both compounds. While patients receiving ciprofloxacin showed a significant increase of Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase Producing-Escherichia coli (ESBL-E. Coli) colonization rates after 3-days treatment (6.9%), rates did not increase in patients receiving RIF-MMX (-0.3%). Both drugs were well-tolerated and safe. Conclusion: The novel multi-matrix formulation of the broad-spectrum, poorly absorbed antibiotic Rifamycin SV was found non-inferior to the systemic antibiotic ciprofloxacin in the oral treatment of non-dysenteric TD with the advantage of a lower risk of ESBL-E. Coli acquisition.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAdministration, OralAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinDiarrheaEcuadorEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleGuatemalaHumansIndiaMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinRifamycinsrifamycin SV

Identifiers

PMID30462260
PMCPMC6331114
OpenAlexW2901605754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.