Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30462232›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2018

Macro-environmental sensitivity for growth rate in Danish Duroc pigs is under genetic control.

Mette D Madsen, Per Madsen, Bjarne Nielsen, Torsten N Kristensen, Just Jensen, Mahmoud Shirali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mette D MadsenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Per MadsenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Bjarne NielsenSEGES, Pig Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Torsten N KristensenDepartment of Bioscience - Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Just JensenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Mahmoud ShiraliDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine (i) the genetic variation in macro-environmental sensitivity (macro-ES) for ADG in Danish Duroc pigs, (ii) the genetic heterogeneity among sexes, and (iii) residual variance heterogeneity among herds. Record of ADG for 32,297 boars (19 herds) and 42,724 gilts (16 herds) was used for analysis. The data were provided by the National Danish Pig Research Centre. The analysis was performed by fitting univariate reaction norm models with the herd-year-month on test (HYM) effect as environmental covariates and herd-specific residual variance for boars and gilts separately under a Bayesian setting. The environmental covariate was inferred simultaneously with other parameters of the model. Gibbs sampling was used to sample model dispersion and location parameters. The posterior means and highest posterior density intervals of the additive genetic variance, genetic correlations for ADG, and heritability were calculated over the continuous environmental range of -3σh to +3σh (SD of the HYM effect). The coheritability of ADG at the average environmental level and ADG in the environments along the -3σh to +3σh environmental gradient were also calculated. The analysis showed significant variation in macro-ES, revealing genotype by environment interactions (G × E) for ADG. The presence of G × E resulted in changes in additive genetic variance and heritability across the -3σh to +3σh range. The genetic correlations were high and positive between ADG in environments differing by 1σh units or less and decreased to moderately positive between ADG in the extreme environments in both sexes. The coheritability of ADG in the environment at the average level and the -3σh environment for boars were greater than the heritability in the environment at the average level, while it was less for gilts. The coheritability of ADG in the environment at the average level and the +3σh environment for boars was less than heritability in the environment at the average level, while it was either the same or greater for gilts, depending on the residual variance. Boars had larger additive genetic and residual variances than gilts. Heterogeneity of residual variances across herds was shown for both sexes. In conclusion, this study shows the presence of macro-ES, genetic variance heterogeneity among sexes for ADG in pigs, and residual variance heterogeneity across herds.

Indexed as

EnvironmentGenetic VariationAnimalsBayes TheoremFemaleGene Expression RegulationGenotypeLongitudinal StudiesMaleSwine

Identifiers

PMID30462232
PMCPMC6276564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.