Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30462180›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2018

Associations between Phytoestrogens, Glucose Homeostasis, and Risk of Diabetes in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Marija Glisic, Natyra Kastrati, Valentina Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Wichor M Bramer, Fariba Ahmadizar, Rajiv Chowdhury, Ah Jan Danser, Anton Jm Roks, Trudy Voortman, Oscar H Franco and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Marija GlisicDepartment of Epidemiology.
Natyra KastratiDepartment of Epidemiology.
Valentina Gonzalez-JaramilloDepartment of Epidemiology.
Wichor M BramerMedical Library.
Fariba AhmadizarDepartment of Epidemiology.
Rajiv ChowdhuryUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ah Jan DanserDivision of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Anton Jm RoksDivision of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Trudy VoortmanDepartment of Epidemiology.
Oscar H FrancoDepartment of Epidemiology.
Taulant MukaDepartment of Epidemiology.
Erasmus MC · NLMedical Library Association · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

ARACHIDONATE METABOLISM IN GLOMERULONEPHRITIS/VASCULITISK08HL001313 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LEFKOWITH, JAMES B · 1985 to 1988
–
British Heart Foundation RG/13/13/30194Medical Research Council MR/L003120/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytoestrogens might have advantageous effects on diabetes in women. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of phytoestrogens on glucose homeostasis and the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) among women. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective observational studies that assessed associations of phytoestrogens (supplementation, dietary intake, or biomarkers) with fasting glucose or insulin, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), or with the risk of T2D were included. We identified 18 RCTs (n = 1687 individuals) investigating the effect of phytoestrogen supplementation on glucose homeostasis and 9 prospective population-based studies (n = 212,796 individuals) examining the association between phytoestrogen intake and the risk of T2D. Compared with placebo, phytoestrogen supplementation resulted in improvements in fasting glucose and HOMA-IR: the pooled mean differences of changes were -0.12 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.20, -0.03 mmol/L) and -0.24 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.45, -0.03 mmol/L), respectively. Although there was no significant decrease in insulin concentrations with overall phytoestrogen supplementation, the pooled mean difference in changes was -0.99 pmol/L (95% CI: -4.65, 2.68 pmol/L). However, the results of RCTs varied by type of phytoestrogens: soy-derived isoflavones and genistein improved glucose homeostasis, whereas isoflavone mix and daidzein had no effect or were associated with an adverse glycemic profile. Higher dietary phytoestrogen intake was associated with a 10% lower risk of developing T2D in observational studies (pooled RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.96; for the highest compared with the lowest quantiles). Results were similar when the analyses were restricted to only medium- and high-quality studies. Overall, phytoestrogens may have a positive influence on glycemia and could be used for diabetes prevention in women. However, for some individual types of phytoestrogens, such as mixed isoflavones, caution is needed in recommending their use in women, because their use could lead to an adverse glycemic profile in women.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FastingFemaleHomeostasisHumansInsulinInsulin ResistanceMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicPhytoestrogensProspective StudiesBlood GlucoseInsulinPhytoestrogens

Identifiers

PMID30462180
PMCPMC6247339
OpenAlexW2901048476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.