Observational studyMedicine2018
The role of serum procalcitonin in the differential diagnosis of pneumonia from pulmonary edema among the patients with pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiography.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential diagnosis in patients with both features of pneumonia and pulmonary edema on chest computed tomography.Medicine · 2025Observational
- Quantifying the Relationship Between Renal Function and Procalcitonin: A Study of 14 431 Blood Cultures.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Diagnostic utility of procalcitonin in inpatients at a community hospital.Clinical case reports · 2019Article
- A pilot point prevalence study of antimicrobial drugs in indoor patients of a teaching hospital in Central India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2019Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of serum procalcitonin (PCT) as a diagnostic biomarker for distinguishing pneumonia from pulmonary edema in patients presenting with pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiography.A comparative study was performed retrospectively in a university-affiliated hospital, from May, 2013 to April, 2015. Adult patients (≥18 years) who showed pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiography and had blood tests with C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), PCT, and N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) on admission were included in the study. Clinical parameters collected on admission were compared between the case group (n = 143) with pneumonia and the control group (n = 88) with pulmonary edema alone.During the study period, a total of 1217 patients were identified. Of them, a total of 231 patients were included in analyses based on exclusion criteria. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, PCT ≥0.25 ng/mL, ESR ≥35 mm/h, CRP ≥18 mg/L, NT-proBNP ≤200 pg/mL, underlying neurologic diseases, fever, sputum, absence of cardiomegaly, and a low Charlson comorbidity index were independently associated with pneumonia. For this model, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in distinguishing between the 2 groups were 90.2%, 79.6%, 87.8%, and 83.3%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.93.This study suggests that the practical use of PCT in conjunction with clinical data can be valuable in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates and guidance for clinicians to prevent antibiotic misuse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.