Observational studyMedicine2018
Suspended over length biliary stents versus conventional plastic biliary stents for the treatment of biliary stricture: A retrospective single-center study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of biliary suprapapillary metal and plastic stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Enteral extended biliary stents versus conventional plastic biliary stents for the treatment of extrahepatic malignant biliary obstruction: a single-center prospective randomized controlled study.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Trial
- Changing Trends in Biliary Stenting for Unresectable Malignant Perihilar Obstructions.Clinical endoscopy · 2020Article
- The first case to decompress the pancreatic duct by reopening a surgical cystogastrostomical fistula using EUS-guided pancreatic drainage.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare patency between suspended over length biliary stents (SOBSs; made from nasobiliary tube) and conventional plastic biliary stents (CPBSs).We retrospectively analyzed 61 patients with extrahepatic biliary stricture who underwent SOBS placement (intrahepatic bile duct) and 74 patients who underwent CPBS placement. Stent patency and complications were compared.The SOBS group was slightly older and contained more females than the CPBS group but other baseline characteristics were similar. Malignant biliary obstruction accounted for 57.4% (SOBS group) and 45.9% (CPBS group) of cases. Technical success rate, hospital stay and post-procedure complications were similar between groups. Median patency in the CPBS and SOBS group was 116 (2-360) days and 175 (3-480) days, respectively (P <.001). The SOBS group had lower stent occlusion rates than the CPBS group at 3 months (9.8% vs 36.5%), 4 months (22.0% vs 55.4%), 5 months (35.6% vs 67.6%), and 6 months (39.3% vs 77.0%) (all P <.01). In Cox regression analysis, stent type (SOBS vs CPBS) was the only factor associated with patency (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.449; 95% CI: 1.973-6.028; P <.001).SOBS may have better medium-term patency than CPBS for benign/malignant biliary stricture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.