Observational studyMedicine2018
Lymphomas diagnosed in an internal medicine department compared to lymphomas diagnosed in other departments: Clinical and outcome differences.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vinca alkaloids as a potential cancer therapeutics: recent update and future challenges.3 Biotech · 2023Review
- Phytochemicals as Chemo-Preventive Agents and Signaling Molecule Modulators: Current Role in Cancer Therapeutics and Inflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Anticancer potential of alkaloids: a key emphasis to colchicine, vinblastine, vincristine, vindesine, vinorelbine and vincamine.Cancer cell international · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphomas are common malignancies with highly variable clinical presentations and prognosis. Prognostic value of clinical presentation at onset is still questioned. The objective of this study was to compare the disease presentation and the outcome of lymphomas diagnosed in an Internal Medicine Department of a University Hospital to disease presentation and outcome of patients who were referred to the Hematology Department of the same institution by other departments or healthcare facilities.This retrospective monocentric observational study included 37 patients. They were matched to 73 patients, who were referred to the Hematology Department, according to age, histology, and Ann Arbor stage. The demographics, clinical and biological presentations, overall survival, and progression-free survival were compared.Patients diagnosed with lymphoma in the Internal Medicine Department were more likely to be febrile (67.5% vs 21.9%; P < .001) and have higher inflammatory markers (mean C-reactive protein 86.6 vs 56.3 mg/L; P = .02). The median overall survival of these patients was poorer (P < .001), even in the subset of patients treated with standard treatment, and remained shorter in multivariable analysis (P = .002). The specific treatment started earlier (20.2 vs 37.5 days; P = .006), but was more frequently palliative (37.8% vs 19.2%; P = .04). There was no significant difference in median progression-free survival.Lymphomas diagnosed in an Internal Medicine Department had aggressive clinical presentations and a poorer outcome, despite an early start of conventional treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.