Observational studyMedicine2018
Efficacy and safety of alfacalcidol in Chinese postmenopausal women aged over 65 with osteoporosis or osteopenia: An open label, non-comparative, post marketing observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the therapeutic efficacy and safety of alfacalcidol among Chinese postmenopausal women (age >65 years) with osteoporosis or osteopenia.A total of 62 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia (>65 years) were recruited from urban residential community of Beijing. The patients daily took oral calcium and alfacalcidol (Alpha D3, 1 μg) for 9 months. Safety and efficacy assessments were performed at baseline and regular intervals. Alfacalcidol was adjusted to a daily dose of 0.5 μg in case of hypercalcemia or hypercalciuria.A significant improvement in "timed up and go test" and "chair rising test" was achieved 3 months after treatment. Significant decreases in bone turnover markers were observed 3 months after the treatment and lasted throughout the study. Nineteen patients discontinued due to adverse events (17 hypercalciuria, 1 hydronephrosis, and 1 stomach ache), while alfacalcidol was adjusted to a daily dose of 0.5 μg in 18 patients (29.0%). Increased serum creatinine was observed when compared to baseline (P <.001), but all the values were in normal range.The treatment with 1 μg alfacalcidol can significantly improve muscle function and bone metabolism. Regular monitoring of urine calcium and timely dosage-adjustments are very important to guarantee the safety of alfacalcidol treatment in Chinese menopausal women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.