Observational studyMedicine2018
Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients with different fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- A translational view of airway epithelial dysfunction in COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Review
- The Emerging Biomarkers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Practical Recommendations for a Selection of Inhaled Corticosteroids in COPD: A Composite ICO Chart.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Severity distribution and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: baseline results of an observational study.Respiratory research · 2022Observational
- Clinical Value of FeNO for Pulmonary Hypertension Diagnosis in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Emergency medicine international · 2022Article
- Local and Systemic Alterations of the L-Arginine/Nitric Oxide Pathway in Sputum, Blood, and Urine of Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Patients and Effects of Antibiotic Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- The Value of FENO Measurement for Predicting Treatment Response in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Article
- Clinical utility of exhaled nitric oxide fraction in the management of asthma and COPD.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have eosinophilic inflammation which may be evaluated via the measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) like asthma. The aim of this prospective study was to assess whether FeNO levels can be used to identify patients with COPD with eosinophilic inflammation who may respond to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy.This study included patients (N = 112) with COPD (age >18 years) who were divided into 4 groups depending upon whether they had high (≥25 parts per billion [ppb]) or low (<25 ppb) pretreatment (baseline) FeNO and if they were treated with either ICS plus long-acting β-agonist (ICS + LABA) or a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA). The 4 groups were: high FeNO/ICS + LABA, high FeNO/LAMA, low FeNO/ICS + LABA, and low FeNO/LAMA. Outcomes assessed included FeNO, COPD assessment test (CAT), and pulmonary function.The high FeNO/ICS + LABA group had the greatest reduction from baseline in FeNO levels (-25.80 ppb ± 27.14) compared with the high FeNO/LAMA, low FeNO/ICS + LABA, and low FeNO/LAMA groups (range, -4.45 to 1.31 ppb; P < .001). The high FeNO/ICS + LABA group also showed the greatest improvement in CAT (-7.20), which was statistically larger than the low FeNO/ICS + LABA and low FeNO/LAMA groups (-1.72 and -2.03, respectively). No difference in pulmonary function following treatment was observed across the 4 groups.This study found that patients with high FeNO showed the greatest reduction in FeNO and improvement in CAT with ICS + LABA therapy, supporting the use of FeNO to identify patients who would benefit from ICS use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.