Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30461373›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2018

The resistomes of six carbapenem-resistant pathogens - a critical genotype-phenotype analysis.

Anna Johnning, Nahid Karami, Erika Tång Hallbäck, Vilhelm Müller, Lena Nyberg, Mariana Buongermino Pereira, Callum Stewart, Tobias Ambjörnsson, Fredrik Westerlund, Ingegerd Adlerberth and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Insights into Carbapenem Resistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Insights into the Metabolic Adaptations of a Carbapenem-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identity ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Johnning2​Centre for Antibiotic Resistance Research, CARe, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nahid Karami2​Centre for Antibiotic Resistance Research, CARe, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Erika Tång Hallbäck3​Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Vilhelm Müller4​Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lena Nyberg4​Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mariana Buongermino Pereira1​Department of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Callum Stewart5​Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Tobias Ambjörnsson5​Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik Westerlund4​Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ingegerd Adlerberth2​Centre for Antibiotic Resistance Research, CARe, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Erik Kristiansson1​Department of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SEChalmers University of Technology · SELund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbapenem resistance is a rapidly growing threat to our ability to treat refractory bacterial infections. To understand how carbapenem resistance is mobilized and spread between pathogens, it is important to study the genetic context of the underlying resistance mechanisms. In this study, the resistomes of six clinical carbapenem-resistant isolates of five different species - Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, two Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa - were characterized using whole genome sequencing. All Enterobacteriaceae isolates and the A. baumannii isolate had acquired a large number of antimicrobial resistance genes (7-18 different genes per isolate), including the following encoding carbapenemases: blaKPC-2, blaOXA-48, blaOXA-72, blaNDM-1, blaNDM-7 and blaVIM-1. In addition, a novel version of blaSHV was discovered. Four new resistance plasmids were identified and their fully assembled sequences were verified using optical DNA mapping. Most of the resistance genes were co-localized on these and other plasmids, suggesting a risk for co-selection. In contrast, five out of six carbapenemase genes were present on plasmids with no or few other resistance genes. The expected level of resistance - based on acquired resistance determinants - was concordant with measured levels in most cases. There were, however, several important discrepancies for four of the six isolates concerning multiple classes of antibiotics. In conclusion, our results further elucidate the diversity of carbapenemases, their mechanisms of horizontal transfer and possible patterns of co-selection. The study also emphasizes the difficulty of using whole genome sequencing for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of pathogens with complex genotypes.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsDrug Resistance, BacterialGenotypeGram-Negative BacteriaHumansPhenotypeWhole Genome SequencingAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemscarbapenem resistancegenotype–phenotype associationhuman pathogenswhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID30461373
PMCPMC6321870
OpenAlexW2901385543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.