Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30461105›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2019

Resource use and cost of annual health checks in primary care for people with intellectual disabilities.

M Panca, M Buszewicz, A Strydom, A Hassiotis, C A Welch, R M Hunter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Article
  4. [Health Technology Assessment of meningococcal B vaccine (TrumenbaJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M PancaResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, UCL Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4031-6478
M BuszewiczResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, UCL Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, London, UK.
A StrydomInstitute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2502-6704
A HassiotisDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
C A WelchDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
R M HunterResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, UCL Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, London, UK.
Department of Health and Social Care · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-DG-0611-10003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe annual health check (AHC) programme, as part of a Directed Enhanced Service, offers an incentive to general practitioners in England to conduct health checks for people with intellectual disabilities (IDs). The aim of this analysis was to estimate the impact on health care costs of AHCs in primary care to the National Health Service in England by comparing adults with ID who did or did not have AHCs using data obtained from The Health Improvement Network.

methodsTwo hundred eight records of people with ID from The Health Improvement Network database were analysed. Baseline health care resource use was captured at the time the first AHC was recorded (i.e. index date), or the earliest date after 1 April 2008 for those without an AHC. We examined the volume of resource use and associated costs that occurred at the time AHCs were performed, as well as before and after the index date. We then estimated the impact of AHCs on health care costs.

resultsThe average cost of AHC was estimated at £142.57 (95%CI £135.41 to £149.74). Primary, community and secondary health care costs increased significantly after the index date in the no AHC group owing to higher increase in resource utilisation. Regression analysis showed that the expected health care cost for those who have an AHC is 56% higher than for those who did not have an AHC. Age and gender were also associated with increase in expected health care cost.

conclusionThe level of resource utilisation increased in both (AHC and no AHC) groups after the index date. Although the level of resource use before index date was lower in the no AHC group, it increased after the index date up to almost reaching the level of resource utilisation in the AHC group. Further research is needed to explore if the AHCs are effective in reducing health inequalities.

Indexed as

AdultEnglandFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleGeneral PractitionersHealth Care CostsHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareState Medicineannual health checkcosthealth care servicesintellectual disability

Identifiers

PMID30461105
PMCPMC6451619
OpenAlexW2901979582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.