Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30460634›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Infusion of 5-Azacytidine (5-AZA) into the fourth ventricle or resection cavity in children with recurrent posterior Fossa Ependymoma: a pilot clinical trial.

David I Sandberg, Bangning Yu, Rajan Patel, John Hagan, Emilie Miesner, Jennifer Sabin, Sarah Smith, Stephen Fletcher, Manish N Shah, Rachael W Sirianni and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intrathecal drug delivery in the era of nanomedicine.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Ependymoma: Advances in Systems Treatment Strategies.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David I SandbergDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Departments of Pediatric Surgery and Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Mischer Neuroscience Center, 6431 Fannin St., MSB 5.140, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. David.I.Sandberg@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0245-6461
Bangning YuDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.
Rajan PatelDivision of Neuroradiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.
John HaganVivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.
Emilie MiesnerDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.
Jennifer SabinDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.
Sarah SmithDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.
Stephen FletcherDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Departments of Pediatric Surgery and Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Mischer Neuroscience Center, 6431 Fannin St., MSB 5.140, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Manish N ShahDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Departments of Pediatric Surgery and Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Mischer Neuroscience Center, 6431 Fannin St., MSB 5.140, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Rachael W SirianniVivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.
Michael D TaylorDevelopmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Center, Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA methylation inhibitors are logical therapeutic candidates for ependymomas originating in the posterior fossa of the brain. Our objective was to test the safety of infusing 5-Azacytidine (5-AZA), a DNA methylation inhibitor, directly into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) spaces of the fourth ventricle or tumor resection cavity in children with recurrent ependymoma originating in the posterior fossa. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn patients with recurrent ependymoma whose disease originated in the posterior fossa, a maximal safe subtotal tumor resection was performed. At the conclusion of the tumor resection, a catheter was surgically placed into the fourth ventricle or tumor resection cavity and attached to a ventricular access device. CSF flow from the posterior fossa to the sacrum was confirmed by CINE phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) postoperatively. 12 consecutive weekly 10 milligram (mg) infusions of 5-Azacytidine (AZA) were planned. Disease response was monitored with MRI scans and CSF cytology.

resultsSix patients were enrolled. One patient was withdrawn prior to planned 5-AZA infusions due to surgical complications after tumor resection. The remaining five patients received 8, 12, 12, 12, and 12 infusions, respectively. There were no serious adverse events or new neurological deficits attributed to 5-AZA infusions. All five patients with ependymoma who received 5-AZA infusions had progressive disease. Two of the five patients, however, were noted to have decrease in the size of at least one intraventricular lesion.

conclusion5-AZA can be infused into the fourth ventricle or posterior fossa tumor resection cavity without causing neurological toxicity. Future studies with higher doses and/or increased dosing frequency are warranted.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAzacitidineBrainChildChild, PreschoolDNA MethylationEnzyme InhibitorsEpendymomaFemaleFourth VentricleHumansInfratentorial NeoplasmsInfusions, IntraventricularMalePilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsAzacitidineEnzyme Inhibitors5-AzacytidineEpendymomaFourth ventricleIntraventricular chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30460634
OpenAlexW2901348298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.