Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30460602›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019

The extended posterior approach for resection of sacral tumours.

S P Mohanty, Madhava Pai Kanhangad, Raghuraj Kundangar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Presentation and surgical management approaches of giant presacral and sacral schwannomas: a case report and systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Surgical Strategy for Sacral Tumor Resection.Yonsei medical journal · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S P MohantyDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576-104, India.
Madhava Pai KanhangadDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576-104, India. madhava.pai@manipal.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0001-5491
Raghuraj KundangarDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576-104, India.
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe conventional posterior approach is mostly advocated for excision of sacral tumours below S2. We describe an operative technique of single-stage en bloc resection of sacral tumours, extending up to S1, through an extended posterior approach.

methodNine patients, who had undergone resection of sacral tumours, by the described technique formed the basis of this study. Four patients had chordomas, whereas schwannoma, neurilemmoma, giant-cell tumour, malignant paraganglioma and recurrent Ewing's sarcoma were seen in one patient each. They were followed up at regular intervals with a mean follow-up of 45.4 months. Perioperative complications, their functional and oncological outcomes at final follow-up were analysed.

resultNone of the patients had any perioperative complications like uncontrolled haemorrhage, injury to the rectum, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. One patient had a superficial wound infection which subsided with regular dressing, and another patient developed a wound breakdown that required an additional flap procedure. At final follow-up, six patients were able to walk without any assistive devices, six patients had normal bladder function, and five patients had normal bowel function. Five patients did not have any recurrence at final follow-up, whereas two were alive with the disease and two had died.

conclusionThe reported technique allows en bloc resection of sacral tumours up to S1, through a posterior-only approach. It is less invasive with minimal morbidity. The functional and oncological outcomes are similar to those reported by other investigators. These slides can be retrieved from electronic supplementary material.

Indexed as

AdultChordomaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGiant Cell Tumor of BoneHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeurilemmomaNeurosurgical ProceduresParagangliomaRetrospective StudiesSacrumSarcoma, EwingSpinal NeoplasmsPosterior approachSacral tumoursSurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID30460602
OpenAlexW2900643219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.