Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30460513›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2019

Psychometric properties of the Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability) measure.

Jenny Downs, Peter Jacoby, Helen Leonard, Amy Epstein, Nada Murphy, Elise Davis, Dinah Reddihough, Andrew Whitehouse, Katrina Williams

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Effects of ganaxolone on non-seizure outcomes in CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder: Double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial.European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society · 2024
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. From QI-disability to QID-12: creating a brief proxy-report measure of quality of life for children with intellectual disability.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Quality of life surveys developed or validated in children or youth with special healthcare needs: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Caregiver-reported quality of life in individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy and other severe neurodevelopmental encephalopathies.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Challenges in Using Parent-Reported Bed and Wake Times for Actigraphy Scoring in Rett-Related Syndromes.American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jenny DownsTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, P.O. Box 855, Perth, WA, 6872, Australia. jenny.downs@telethonkids.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7358-9037
Peter JacobyTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, P.O. Box 855, Perth, WA, 6872, Australia.
Helen LeonardTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, P.O. Box 855, Perth, WA, 6872, Australia.
Amy EpsteinTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, P.O. Box 855, Perth, WA, 6872, Australia.
Nada MurphyTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, P.O. Box 855, Perth, WA, 6872, Australia.
Elise DavisThe Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Dinah ReddihoughDepartment of Neurodevelopment and Disability, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Andrew WhitehouseTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, P.O. Box 855, Perth, WA, 6872, Australia.
Katrina WilliamsDepartment of Neurodevelopment and Disability, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1103745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChildren with intellectual disability encounter daily challenges beyond those captured in current quality of life measures. This study evaluated a new parent-report measure for children with intellectual disability, the Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability).

methodsQI-Disability was administered to 253 primary caregivers of children (aged 5-18 years) with intellectual disability across four diagnostic groups: Rett syndrome, Down syndrome, cerebral palsy or autism spectrum disorder. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted and goodness of fit of the factor structure assessed. Associations between QI-Disability scores, and diagnostic and age groups were examined with linear regression.

resultsSix domains were identified: physical health, positive emotions, negative emotions, social interaction, leisure and the outdoors, and independence. Goodness-of-fit statistics were satisfactory and similar for the whole sample and when the sample was split by ability to walk or talk. On 100 point scales and compared to Rett syndrome, children with Down syndrome had higher leisure and the outdoors (coefficient 10.6, 95% CI 3.4,17.8) and independence (coefficient 29.7, 95% CI 22.9, 36.5) scores, whereas children with autism spectrum disorder had lower social interaction scores (coefficient - 12.8, 95% CI - 19.3, - 6.4). Scores for positive emotions (coefficient - 6.1, 95% CI - 10.7, - 1.6) and leisure and the outdoors (coefficient 5.4, 95% CI - 10.6, - 0.1) were lower for adolescents compared with children.

conclusionsInitial evaluation suggests that QI-Disability is a reliable and valid measure of quality of life across the spectrum of intellectual disability. It has the potential to allow clearer identification of support needs and measure responsiveness to interventions.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsQuality of LifeAdolescenceChildIntellectual disabilityMeasurementQuality of lifeTest validation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.