Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30460486›Full record

SynthesisClinical drug investigation2019

A Systematic Review on the Extent and Quality of Pharmacoeconomic Publications in Egypt.

Samar Farid, Mahmoud Elmahdawy, Darin Baines

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical drug investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Unit Costs in Health Economic Evaluations: Quo Vadis, Austria?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Health Conditions in Lebanese Community Setting.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samar FaridClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mahmoud ElmahdawyISPOR Egypt's Chapter, Cairo, Egypt.
Darin BainesDepartment of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK. dbaines@bournemouth.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9502-4678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEgypt faces many challenges when matching patient needs with available resources. Consequently, there has been an increasing interest in pharmacoeconomics as an aid tool in health decision-making to better allocate resources.

objectivesTo review and evaluate the volume and the quality of published pharmacoeconomic studies in Egypt.

methodsA literature search was conducted in August 2018 using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library to identify published Egyptian pharmacoeconomic studies. Articles were included if they were original economic studies, written and published in English, and conducted in Egypt. Each article was assessed independently by two reviewers using the 100-point Quality of Health Evaluation Studies (QHES) scale.

resultsFifteen studies published between 2002 and 2017 were included in the review. Most of them were cost-effectiveness analyses (60%). The minority used secondary data (33.3%) or adopted modeling techniques (40%). The mean QHES score of the included studies was 70.1 ± 21.8, and approximately 40% of them had a QHES score of more than 80.

conclusionPharmacoeconomic evaluations in Egypt are still in their infancy. The Egyptian guidelines for economic evaluation should be adopted and the EQ-5D-5L value sets should be developed to increase the quality of economic research.

Indexed as

Economics, PharmaceuticalCost-Benefit AnalysisEgyptHumansPublications

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.